AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
October 2026 Edition · The permanent record of this edition. The unqualified address always carries the latest edition.
Index › Customer › Feedback › Enterprise › October 2026 Edition

Customer feedback and surveys for enterprise buyers

Asked as “customer feedback and survey platform”, and as “NPS and customer experience survey tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
41Qualtrics CustomerXM28CustomerGauge11Medallia Experience Cloud20others

41% of first choices, clear leader.

Since September 2026▲+9Since September 2026: 34% → 43%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Qualtrics CustomerXM held the lead, +9 points on 34%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Qualtrics CustomerXM41%15%66endorsed leader▲+9Since September 2026: 34% → 43%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.34% → 43%
02CustomerGauge28%4%24accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 26% → 26%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.26% → 26%
03Medallia Experience Cloud11%17%59accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 15% → 9%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 9%
04SurveyMonkey6%43%46criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 6% → 6%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 6%
05Alchemer2%0%21accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
06Survicate2%10%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
07Typeform2%70%20criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Google Forms Lab in the set0%82%11criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
09QuestionPro0%9%11accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
08InMoment0%5%19accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Forms is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Qualtrics CustomerXM41%
02CustomerGauge28%
03Medallia Experience Cloud11%
04SurveyMonkey6%
05Alchemer2%
06Survicate2%
07Typeform2%
08InMoment0%
09QuestionPro0%
10Google Forms0%

What they warned about

Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
SurveyMonkey
43%
20 of 46 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Platforms to **Avoid** for Large Enterprises... **SurveyMonkey**: Limited analytics beyond basic reporting; struggles with enterprise-scale response volumes” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Typeform
70%
14 of 20 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Tools like **SurveyMonkey**, **Typeform** (standard editions), and **JotForm** are excellent for small teams but generally fail as central enterprise solutions” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Google Forms
82%
9 of 11 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Google Forms, Microsoft Forms and similar zero-budget builders lack enterprise administration, configurable access controls, audit-traceable reporting baselines and data-residency guarantees” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Medallia Experience Cloud
17%
10 of 59 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Two cautions matter for 2026: the platform is built for the upper end of the market with long timelines, and in April 2026, Thoma Bravo transferred Medallia to its creditors” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt

What they cite

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.

Sites the answers cite

79 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1137 links across 262 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 2 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Guideflow40 answers · 51 citations · 12 models
vendor site · CustomerGauge30 answers · 60 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Zonka Feedback30 answers · 43 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Chattermill28 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
27 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Survicate26 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Enterpret23 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Typeform23 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
vendor site · CleverX20 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Qualtrics20 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Sprig20 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · SurveyMonkey19 answers · 34 citations · 10 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best customer feedback and survey platform”, “customer feedback and survey platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Qualtrics CustomerXM qualtrics.com41%1362001,028,410$2166
CustomerGauge customergauge.com28%66210022,116$25417
Medallia Experience Cloud medallia.com11%113700187,63611
SurveyMonkey surveymonkey.com6%191165,0002,0231,683,535$5001062
Alchemer alchemer.com2%438,1001,852133,572$17883
Survicate survicate.com2%61720823,06606
Sogolytics sogolytics.com2%7
Attest askattest.com2%2333,1005,171220,39226
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Service Hub 2%
2%235368,0009,776
Qualtrics Experience Management2%

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (surveymonkey.com, survicate.com, zonkafeedback.com). The first result for “best customer feedback and survey platform” is surveysparrow.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best customer feedback and survey platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which NPS and customer experience survey tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade customer feedback and survey platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best customer feedback and survey platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a customer feedback and survey platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which customer feedback and survey platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5CustomerGauge
Two alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
CustomerGauge, Qualtrics CustomerXMChanged
One alternativeMedallia Experience Cloud
no first choiceQualtrics CustomerXM
Two alternativesInMoment, Medallia Experience Cloud
no first choiceagainst: Google Forms, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
GPT-5.4 miniQualtrics CustomerXM
Three alternativesAlchemer, Medallia Experience Cloud, SurveyMonkey
Qualtrics CustomerXMHeld
Three alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, SurveyMonkey, Verint
no first choice
Four alternativesAlchemer, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey
Medallia Experience Cloud
One alternativeQualtrics CustomerXM
Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkeynothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCustomerGauge
Six alternativesEnterpret, Medallia Experience Cloud, Pendo, Qualtrics CustomerXM, Sprig, Thematic
CustomerGaugeHeld
Four alternativesGainsight CS, Gainsight PX, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
against: Slido, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Two alternativesAlchemer, Sprinklr
Survicate
Four alternativesAskNicely, Formbricks, Mopinion, Pollfish
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Qualtrics CustomerXM
Four alternativesAlchemer, Sprig, SurveyMonkey, Userback
against: Google Forms, Jotform, Medallia Experience Cloud, Microsoft Forms, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Perplexity SonarCustomerGauge
Three alternativesChattermill, Enterpret, UserVoice
Qualtrics CustomerXMChanged
One alternativeCustomerGauge
InMoment, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Three alternativesAlchemer, Enterpret, Forsta
Qualtrics CustomerXM
One alternativeQuestionPro
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, SurveyMonkey, Survicate, Typeform
no first choiceagainst: Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Grok 4.1 FastQualtrics CustomerXM
Four alternativesCustomerGauge, InMoment, Medallia Experience Cloud, SurveyMonkey
against: Typeform
Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXMChangedagainst: CustomerGauge, GetFeedback, SurveyMonkeyMedallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Three alternativesAlchemer, InMoment, SurveyMonkey
against: GetFeedback
SurveyMonkey
Two alternativesAlchemer, Zonka Feedback
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Four alternativesAlchemer, Enalyzer, Sogolytics, Zonka Feedback
against: Google Forms, Hotjar, InMoment, Jotform, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, Sprig, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Mistral SmallQualtrics CustomerXM
Three alternativesEnterpret, SurveyMonkey, Survicate
CustomerGaugeChanged
Two alternativesHubSpot Service Hub, QuestionPro
Qualtrics CustomerXM
Five alternativesInMoment, Medallia Experience Cloud, Sprinklr, SurveyMonkey, Zonka Feedback
Qualtrics CustomerXM
One alternativeFrill
against: Canny, Zonka Feedback
no first choiceagainst: GetFeedback, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
DeepSeek V4 FlashCustomerGauge
Three alternativesAlchemer, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
against: SurveyMonkey
CustomerGaugeHeld
Two alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
against: SurveyMonkey
Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Four alternativesAlchemer, Forsta, Sprinklr, SurveyMonkey
Qualtrics CustomerXM
Two alternativesAlchemer, Attest
against: Chattermill, Pollfish, SurveyMonkey, Thematic, Zonka Feedback
Qualtrics CustomerXM
Two alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, SurveyMonkey
against: Formspree, Google Forms, Jotform, SurveyMonkey, Typeform, Wufoo
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceCustomerGaugeChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: SurveyMonkey
Qwen 3.7 FlashQualtrics CustomerXM
Four alternativesDelighted, Medallia Experience Cloud, Survicate, UserVoice
CustomerGaugeChanged
Four alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, Refiner, Satismeter
Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Three alternativesInMoment, Survicate, UserVoice
against: Delighted
Jotform, Typeform
One alternativeDelighted
against: Qualtrix
no first choiceagainst: Jotform, Oracle, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SAP, SurveyMonkey, Typeform, Workday
Kimi K2CustomerGauge
Two alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Qualtrics CustomerXMChanged
Two alternativesCustomerGauge, Medallia Experience Cloud
Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Four alternativesAlchemer, CustomerGauge, InMoment XI Platform, Verint
against: SurveyMonkey
Alchemer, Sogolytics
One alternativeSurveyMonkey
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, QuestionPro
no first choiceagainst: Canny, Google Forms, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
GLM 4.7 FlashXQualtrics CustomerXM
Three alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, Sprig, SurveyMonkey
Qualtrics Experience ManagementChanged
Three alternativesCustomerGauge, Delighted, Medallia Experience Cloud
Qualtrics CustomerXM
Four alternativesAskNicely, Birdeye, InMoment, Medallia Experience Cloud
HubSpot Service Hub, SurveyMonkey
One alternativeAlchemer
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
no first choiceagainst: Google Forms, Jotform, SurveyMonkey, SurveySparrow, Typeform
MiniMax M2.5Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
One alternativeSurvicate
CustomerGauge, Qualtrics CustomerXMChanged
Two alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, SurveySensum
Qualtrics CustomerXM
Six alternativesCanny, InMoment, Medallia Experience Cloud, Pendo, Sprig, SurveyMonkey
Attest
One alternativeSurveyMonkey
against: Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
no first choiceagainst: Canny, SurveyLama, SurveyMonkey
GPT-6 LunaCustomerGauge
Two alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
CustomerGaugeHeld
Two alternativesMedallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Six alternativesAlchemer, Press Ganey Forsta, QuestionPro, Sprinklr, SurveyMonkey, Verint
Medallia Experience Cloud
Two alternativesQualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey
no first choice
Four alternativesAlchemer, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM, SurveyMonkey
against: Delighted, Google Forms, SurveyMonkey’s self-serve or team plans, Typeform
Muse Glimmer 30BCustomerGauge
Three alternativesGainsight, Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Qualtrics CustomerXMChanged
Two alternativesCustomerGauge, Medallia Experience Cloud
Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Four alternativesForsta, InMoment, Sprig, SurveyMonkey
Medallia Experience Cloud, Qualtrics CustomerXM
Two alternativesPollfish, Survicate
against: SurveyMonkey
no first choiceagainst: Google Forms, Microsoft Forms, SurveyMonkey, Typeform
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 10:33yes97 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:53yes45 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 07:46yes1628 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 10:56yes172 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:02yes238 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 14:07yes126 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 07:32yes2233 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:48yes51 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 11:25yes1042 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:49yes1919 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:00yes24257 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 11:51yes1027 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:33yes317 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:56yes2426 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:02yes108 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 12:18yes54 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:20yes1124 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 12:10yes205 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:38yes218 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 09:10yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:17yes2329 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 10:28yes51 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 09:26yes926 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 08:15yes1119 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 07:58yes2431 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 08:22yes1129 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:23yes318 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:31yes1534 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 09:09yes1611 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 08:54yes68 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 11:39yes1230 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:51yes175 s
ComparativeGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 11:37yes239 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:03yes1511 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 09:28yes2468 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:07yes51 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:35yes1038 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 10:10yes2029 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 13:52yes2473 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 07:31yes1932 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:44yes937 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 11:19yes2434 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 07:30yes98 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:53yes25 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 12:59yes2435 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 11:22yes186 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 09:39yes2515 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 14:08yes95 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 14:00yes2434 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 11:26yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:01no032 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 09:10yes2435 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 13:36yes2151 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 13:48yes2549 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 11:48yes314 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 10:42yes2451 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:00yes1811 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 07:36yes38 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 13:04yes1326 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 08:29yes205 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 10:35yes158 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 11:10no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 11:09yes1745 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 07:55yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 08:07no032 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 12:01no057 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 09:14yes2021 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 12:57no09 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 12:21yes325 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 08:10yes1430 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-10-01 08:53yes1810 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-10-01 09:49yes59 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.5-flash2026-10-01 09:48yes922 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-10-01 07:33yes183 s
Negative framingGrok 4.1 Fastspacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex2026-10-01 08:13yes248 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-10-01 10:50yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-10-01 08:30yes2441 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-10-01 13:58yes54 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-10-01 13:54yes1046 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-10-01 07:39yes2425 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-10-01 11:22yes2333 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-10-01 10:18yes1021 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-10-01 10:51yes417 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-10-01 09:50yes2246 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
HubSpot read as HubSpot Service Hub
Medallia read as Medallia Experience Cloud
Medallia (now part of Sprinklr) read as Medallia Experience Cloud
Qualtrics read as Qualtrics CustomerXM
Qualtrics (CustomerXM) read as Qualtrics CustomerXM
Qualtrics (SAP) read as Qualtrics CustomerXM
Qualtrics XM read as Qualtrics CustomerXM
Qualtrics XM Platform read as Qualtrics CustomerXM
Zonka read as Zonka Feedback
Unresolved, counted raw
Enalyzer
Formspree
InMoment XI Platform
Lookback
Momentive/GetFeedback
NICE Satmetrix
Oracle
Qualtrics Experience Management (XM)
SAP
Salesforce
SurveyLama
SurveyMonkey’s self-serve or team plans
Wufoo
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Customer educationCustomer success →