GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › QuestionPro · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

QuestionPro

16Judge labels

3First choices

4Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. QuestionPro was named 5 times in Feedback, where Google Forms led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 85

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise9 of 77

under the label threshold

In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named QuestionPro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer feedback and surveys	Customer	2%	15 of 104	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Google Forms at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for QuestionPro yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated QuestionPro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“is SurveySparrow, Survicate, or QuestionPro, as they offer the best value for mid-market teams” Llama 4 Maverick · Feedback · direct prompt · first choice

“better value if you want a general survey platform in the $50–$200/mo range” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · direct prompt · alternative

“or QuestionPro on a budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as QuestionPro, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuestionPro was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Qualtrics10 of 165Not in the top three

Medallia10 of 163Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey10 of 161Not in the top three

Survicate7 of 160Not in the top three

Alchemer6 of 160Not in the top three

SurveySparrow6 of 160Not in the top three

Google Forms5 of 164Not in the top three

Typeform5 of 160Not in the top three

Jotform4 of 160Not in the top three

SurveyPlanet3 of 161Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QuestionPro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 16 answers that named QuestionPro and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

guideflow.com1

help.surveymonkey.com1

learn.g2.com1

proprofssurvey.com1

questionpro.comYour site1

sogolytics.com1

surveysparrow.com1

thecxlead.com1

trustpilot.com1

Ten of the eleven domain citations in answers naming QuestionPro came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/complaint-management/small-business1

g2.com/products/questionpro/pricing1

g2.com/products/questionpro/reviews1

g2.com/products/surveysparrow/pricing1

g2.com/products/zoho-survey/pricing1

guideflow.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools1

guideflow.com/blog/survey-software-tools1

help.surveymonkey.com/en/getfeedback/getfeedback/plans1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuestionPro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuestionPro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at questionpro.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.