Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 15 → 28 of 83
1 category · RankedQuestionPro
16Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Feedback for enterprise buyers
Rank 34 of 84 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business30 of 85
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market34 of 84
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise15 of 68
0%11 labels
accepted challenger
In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named QuestionPro for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 0% | 34 of 84 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, QuestionPro held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feedback · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 15 → 34 of 81
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 15 of 64
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feedback | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 34 of 84 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated QuestionPro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated QuestionPro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Feature depth at mid-market price | Broad use-case coverage” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · scale prompt · alternative
“Solid ratings (4.35)” Kimi K2 · Feedback · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as QuestionPro, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuestionPro was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as QuestionPro, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and QuestionPro was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named QuestionPro. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named QuestionPro and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com11
formbricks.com6
getperspective.ai6
survicate.com6
worldmetrics.org6
zonkafeedback.com6
alchemer.com5
chattermill.com5
cleverx.com5
sprig.com5
Sixty-one of the sixty-one domain citations in answers naming QuestionPro came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
questionpro.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, QuestionPro takes 0% of first choices and CustomerGauge takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
questionpro.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, QuestionPro takes 0% of first choices and CustomerGauge takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer feedback and survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer feedback and survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 4,400 a month (“questionpro”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 80 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 936,799 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 56,627 · 3,319 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 33,676
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 34 of 84 in feedback
Segment leader
24%
CustomerGauge
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on questionpro.com
10,094
subdomains included
Content
2,184
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,440
Product · Integration
290 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,864 | 19 | 2026-09-24 | CRM, Ecommerce marketing | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 105 | 0 | 2020-08-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 93 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | CRM | |
| Comparison | 50 | 0 | 2026-01-29 | ||
| Case study | 35 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 20 | 0 | 2025-12-05 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| News or press | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Audience self service blog
- 2026-09-24Heres how emerging themes in textai can help you survive wave seven with a wave one codebook report or ebook
- 2026-09-24Driver analysis employee experience blog
- 2026-09-23Insightshub audio analysis guide blog
- 2026-09-22Powerpoint exports questionpro bi blog
- 2026-09-21Pumpkin spice debate textai datasets blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page questionpro.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow QuestionPro
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
QuestionPro is its own company.ShowHide
The company
QuestionPro is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-Powered insights, backed by real experts.
- For
- market research professionals
- Price stated
- PRICING questionpro.com
- Starting price
- 0 questionpro.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- SIGN UP FREE questionpro.com
- Certifications
- CCPAGDPRISO 27001HIPAAISO 27001:2022SSAE 16/SOC 2PCI DSSFERPA
- Hosting
- GlobalRegional
- Customers named
- googleaudienergizerbmwlegal shieldrokunisa
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations
What QuestionPro's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: questionpro.com, questionpro.com/pricing, trust.questionpro.com, questionpro.com/features, questionpro.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when QuestionPro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as QuestionPro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for QuestionPro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where QuestionPro is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name QuestionPro, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.