GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Sprig · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Sprig

19Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sprig was named 8 times in Feedback, where Google Forms led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business32 of 85

under the label threshold

Mid-market34 of 104

under the label threshold

Enterprise17 of 77

under the label threshold

In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sprig for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer feedback and surveys	Customer	0%	34 of 104	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Google Forms at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sprig yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sprig across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Excellent for in-product micro-surveys, video feedback, and AI-driven analysis” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feedback · scale prompt · alternative

“Choose Sprig or Pendo if you want feedback inside a product or app.” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative

“Purpose-built for product-led growth teams optimizing specific user flows” Kimi K2 · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative

“In-app, moment-of-friction feedback \u2192 Sprig / Hotjar” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sprig, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sprig was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Qualtrics17 of 199Not in the top three

Medallia16 of 194Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey16 of 192Not in the top three

Typeform12 of 191Not in the top three

Survicate10 of 192Not in the top three

InMoment10 of 191Not in the top three

Delighted10 of 190Not in the top three

Canny8 of 190Not in the top three

Google Forms8 of 190Not in the top three

Pendo8 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sprig. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 19 answers that named Sprig and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

customergauge.com1

deeto.com1

featureupvote.com1

frill.co1

getperspective.ai1

greatquestion.co1

guideflow.com1

heymarvin.com1

mopinion.com1

proprofssurvey.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Sprig came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

customergauge.com/blog/client-feedback-tool1

deeto.com/blog-post/customer-feedback-platforms-compared1

featureupvote.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools1

frill.co/blog/customer-feedback-software1

getperspective.ai/blog/best-customer-feedback-tools-2026-12-platforms-compared1

getperspective.ai/blog/customer-feedback-management-software-2026-10-platforms-ranked1

greatquestion.co/blog/customer-feedback-tools1

guideflow.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sprig's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sprig, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sprig.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.