AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › InMoment · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

InMoment

35Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Feedback for enterprise buyers
Rank 32 of 84 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named InMoment for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Customer feedback and surveysCustomer0%32 of 840%4under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, InMoment held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Feedback · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 82 → 75 of 83
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 26 → 32 of 81
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 13 of 64

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Feedback2%0%▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 26 → 32 of 84

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated InMoment across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative16 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative8 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Omnichannel CX, digital experience + voice analytics” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as InMoment, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and InMoment was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Medallia Experience Cloud28 of 354Not among the top eight
Qualtrics CustomerXM26 of 3511Not among the top eight
SurveyMonkey17 of 352Not among the top eight
Typeform11 of 351Not among the top eight
Alchemer10 of 350Not among the top eight
Sprig7 of 350Not among the top eight
Survicate7 of 350Not among the top eight
Birdeye6 of 351Not among the top eight
Chattermill6 of 350Not among the top eight
Enterpret6 of 350Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named InMoment. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 35 answers that named InMoment and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com17
getperspective.ai14
chattermill.com12
g2.com12
survicate.com12
enterpret.com11
typeform.com11
zonkafeedback.com10
learn.g2.com8
blog.hubspot.com7

114 of the 114 domain citations in answers naming InMoment came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

inmoment.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, InMoment takes 0% of first choices and CustomerGauge takes 24%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “customer feedback and survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer feedback and survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,400 a month (“inmoment”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
80 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 45,892 a month
Searches its site ranks for
6,192 · 381 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,845
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
2 ads · 2 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2024, as InMoment, Inc., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 84 in feedback
Segment leader
24%
CustomerGauge
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
35 answers
Its own site cited
in 34 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on inmoment.com
5,969
subdomains included
Content
2,754
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
0 · 102
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press1,391undatedCRM
Blog71702025-07-29SEO, Social media
Case study309undated
Webinar or virtual event118undatedCRM
Conference or event11702026-06-26
Glossary or explainer46undated
Podcast or video18undated
Template or tool1502024-06-13
Comparison12undated
Report or ebook11undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page inmoment.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow InMoment

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

InMoment.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Salt Lake City
Founded
2002

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Integrated Customer Experience Solutions with AI
For
Customer Experience Leaders
Price stated
Pricing that’s Simple, Flexible, and Highest Rated inmoment.com/plans-packages
Certifications
leader in the Feedback Analytics category on G2
Customers named
Jack in the BoxFoot LockerUScellularMetro BankDocuSignRingCentralRealogyNew Relic
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What InMoment's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: inmoment.com, inmoment.com/plans-packages, inmoment.com/roles/product, inmoment.com/customer-stories, inmoment.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when InMoment's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as InMoment, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for InMoment by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where InMoment is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name InMoment, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at inmoment.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.