Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 104 → 37 of 115
2 categories · RankedChattermill
29Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Customer intel for mid-market buyers
Rank 25 of 142 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business38 of 118
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 142
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise29 of 143
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In customer intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Chattermill for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 25 of 142 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 0% | 27 of 84 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Chattermill held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Customer intel · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 → 24 of 133
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 43 → 29 of 134
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 25 of 142 |
| Feedback | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 27 of 84 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Chattermill across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Chattermill across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If customer feedback analysis is a priority, consider Chattermill for its specialized AI capabilities.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Customer intel · direct prompt · alternative
“best for omnichannel feedback analysis at scale” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · direct prompt · alternative
“Best AI‑powered analytics layer” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chattermill, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chattermill was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Chattermill, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chattermill was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chattermill. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named Chattermill and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
chattermill.comYour site27
enterpret.com12
zendesk.com12
getperspective.ai11
learn.g2.com11
guideflow.com10
zonkafeedback.com9
blog.hubspot.com8
customergauge.com8
contentsquare.com6
Eighty-seven of the 114 domain citations in answers naming Chattermill came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
chattermill.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chattermill takes 0% of first choices and Amplitude takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
chattermill.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Chattermill takes 0% of first choices and Amplitude takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer analytics and intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer analytics and intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 260 a month (“chattermill”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 7,101 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,980 · 9 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,210
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 14 clicks and $1,096 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 142 in customer intel
Segment leader
18%
Amplitude
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 29 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 29 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on chattermill.com
823
subdomains included
Content
571
counted in the table below
Documentation
108
Product · Integration
16 · 98
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 423 | 38 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 75 | 34 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 25 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Case study | 21 | 16 | 2026-07-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | 1 | 2026-07-03 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 0 | 2026-03-08 | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 0 | 2023-03-20 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2020-11-30 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Enterpret vs medallia comparison
- 2026-09-28Enterpret vs qualtrics comparison
- 2026-09-28Sentisum vs caplena comparison
- 2026-09-28Medallia pricing blog
- 2026-09-28Productboard pricing blog
- 2026-09-28Sprinklr pricing blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page chattermill.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Chattermill
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Chattermill is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Chattermill is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-native voice of customer & feedback analysis software; AI-native customer feedback analysis & voice of customer platform
- For
- CX-focused teams; Customer Experience and Voice of Customer teams; Product and UX teams; Support and Operations teams; enterprises
- Price stated
- Book a demo for pricing details chattermill.com
- Starting price
- 0 chattermill.com
- Free plan or trial
- It's available to all Chattermill customers. chattermill.com/platform/mcp
- Integrations claimed
- 65 chattermill.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPR & CCPA COMPLIANCEISO 27001 CERTIFIEDGDPR and CCPASOC2 Type IIISO 27001:2022 certifiedSOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001:2022
- Customers named
- UberHelloFreshFootasylumE.ON NextQontoMindful ChefLimehomeBlaBlaCar
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Chattermill's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: chattermill.com, trust.chattermill.com, chattermill.com/platform/mcp, chattermill.com/customers, chattermill.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chattermill's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chattermill, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Chattermill by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Chattermill is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Chattermill, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.