| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audience and consumer insights platforms | Marketing | 2% | 19 of 155 | 38% | 13 | criticized challenger | |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 27 of 142 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Contact center quality assurance | Customer | 0% | 35 of 81 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by EvaluAgent at 28% | |
| Customer success platforms | Customer | 0% | 46 of 49 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 42% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 84 of 105 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 71 of 172 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Qualtrics as the strongest all-around consumer insights and audience research platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Qualtrics is a better fit, since it is recommended for situations where respondents must answer new questions” Perplexity Sonar · Market intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Qualtrics if you need structured, enterprise-grade feedback collection and CX management.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Audience insights · comparative prompt · alternative
“the best-in-class solutions (e.g., Playvox, Qualtrics, advanced EnsembleIQ styles)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contact center QA · negative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid: Enterprise tools like Qualtrics unless you have dedicated research staff—they're often overkill and overpriced” Kimi K2 · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Rather than recommending a single, bloated enterprise platform like Qualtrics (which can easily eat up $50k+ of your budget)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Move to Qualtrics only if you have the resources to run continuous, statistically rigorous experience research internally.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Some users report collaboration limitations and weaker international survey capabilities compared to specialists.” Grok 4.20 · Audience insights · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 104 answers that named Qualtrics and are not a share of its labels.
233 of the 233 domain citations in answers naming Qualtrics came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,678 | undated | |||
| Case study | 136 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 78 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 76 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 21 | 0 | 2020-03-02 | ||
| News or press | 21 | 0 | 2020-08-17 | ||
| Conference or event | 17 | 0 | 2020-11-20 | ||
| Template or tool | 8 | 0 | 2020-09-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2020-07-21 |
Every page qualtrics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Qualtrics's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: qualtrics.com, qualtrics.com/pricing, trust.qualtrics.com, qualtrics.com/platform, qualtrics.com/legal/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qualtrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qualtrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Qualtrics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: