AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Qualtrics · October 2026 Edition
6 categories · Ranked

Qualtrics

105Judge labels
13First choices
42Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in Audience insights for enterprise buyers
Rank 19 of 155 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 38% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Qualtrics →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In audience insights · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Qualtrics for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing2%19 of 15538%13criticized challenger
Customer intelligence and data scienceGTM data and infrastructure0%27 of 14214%7under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Contact center quality assuranceCustomer0%35 of 810%2under 10 labels · led by EvaluAgent at 28%
Customer success platformsCustomer0%46 of 49100%1under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 42%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
In-app messaging and customer communicationsCustomer0%84 of 105100%1under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Market intelligence platformsGTM data and infrastructure0%71 of 1720%1under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Qualtrics yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Qualtrics across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01012
Perplexity Sonar02103
Grok 4.2001113
Mistral Small01012
DeepSeek V4 Flash03104
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00022
Kimi K200022
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B01012

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase23 labels13
Comparative31 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative34 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative105 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend Qualtrics as the strongest all-around consumer insights and audience research platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Qualtrics is a better fit, since it is recommended for situations where respondents must answer new questions” Perplexity Sonar · Market intelligence · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Qualtrics if you need structured, enterprise-grade feedback collection and CX management.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Audience insights · comparative prompt · alternative
“the best-in-class solutions (e.g., Playvox, Qualtrics, advanced EnsembleIQ styles)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contact center QA · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid: Enterprise tools like Qualtrics unless you have dedicated research staff—they're often overkill and overpriced” Kimi K2 · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Rather than recommending a single, bloated enterprise platform like Qualtrics (which can easily eat up $50k+ of your budget)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Move to Qualtrics only if you have the resources to run continuous, statistically rigorous experience research internally.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Audience insights · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Some users report collaboration limitations and weaker international survey capabilities compared to specialists.” Grok 4.20 · Audience insights · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qualtrics, over the 104 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qualtrics was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GWI37 of 1049Compare →
Mixpanel30 of 1044Not among the top eight
Amplitude26 of 1046Not among the top eight
Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence22 of 1041Not among the top eight
Meltwater18 of 1040Not among the top eight
SurveyMonkey17 of 1042Not among the top eight
Adobe Real-Time CDP16 of 1040Not among the top eight
Talkwalker13 of 1041Not among the top eight
YouGov Profiles12 of 1043Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qualtrics. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 101 of the 104 answers that named Qualtrics and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com36
learn.g2.com30
guideflow.com28
chattermill.com25
meltwater.com24
gartner.com20
gitnux.org19
us.fitgap.com18
pipeline.zoominfo.com17
cleverx.com16

233 of the 233 domain citations in answers naming Qualtrics came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

qualtrics.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Qualtrics takes 2% of first choices and SparkToro takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “audience insights platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best audience insights platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
135,000 a month (“qualtrics”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4,637 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 1,028,410 a month
Searches its site ranks for
49,516 · 6,871 in the top three
Sites linking to it
146,721
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 2 clicks and $21 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
66+ ads · 66 text · 66 shown in the last 30 days

First shown February 2023, as Qualtrics, LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 44 in the year, 22 before. 54 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 19 of 155 in audience insights
Segment leader
19%
SparkToro
First choices
13 across its categories
Named in
104 answers
Its own site cited
in 101 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on qualtrics.com
14,016
subdomains included
Content
2,041
counted in the table below
Documentation
10,044
Product · Integration
3 · 1
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,678undated
Case study136undated
Comparison78undated
Glossary or explainer76undated
Report or ebook2102020-03-02
News or press2102020-08-17
Conference or event1702020-11-20
Template or tool802020-09-23
Webinar or virtual event602020-07-21
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page qualtrics.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Qualtrics

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Qualtrics; a claim can dispute any of them.
Qualtrics XM 4Qualtrics (XM) 1

Follow Qualtrics

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Qualtrics.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Provo, United States
Founded
2002
Ownership
Public, XM on Nasdaq

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
One category-defining platform for experience management—powered by leading AI and packaged to suit your program's needs.
For
Enterprises, governments and healthcare
Price stated
Pay for planned usage; competitive pricing is based on metrics you know and can forecast and account for accurately. qualtrics.com/pricing
Certifications
platform certificationsISO 4200127001SOC 2 Type IIHITRUSTCustomer Favorableindependently conducted penetration test resultssecurity certifications
Hosting
North AmericaEMEAAPJ
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, customers

What Qualtrics's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: qualtrics.com, qualtrics.com/pricing, trust.qualtrics.com, qualtrics.com/platform, qualtrics.com/legal/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qualtrics's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qualtrics, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Qualtrics by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Qualtrics is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Qualtrics, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at qualtrics.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.