One of fourteen models named GWI first on the direct prompt; zero named Qualtrics. GWI was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Qualtrics by eleven and GWI carries 39 labels and Qualtrics 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Provo, United States, founded 2002. Named in six categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the audience and consumer insights platforms page.
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, GWI and Qualtrics were named in the same answer thirty-seven times, of the 123 answers naming GWI and the 104 naming Qualtrics. In those answers Qualtrics took the first choice six times and GWI nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“frequent complaints about data inaccuracy, biased results, poor filtering/search, and limited regional coverage” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“enterprise-level audience intelligence tools (like GWI, Meltwater, or Brandwatch) are often out of reach, as they can cost tens of thousands of dollars annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Users highlight the inaccuracy of GWI's data, which often requires custom studies and leads to biased results.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“GWI is the best pick for teams that need shared, repeatable audience definitions across planning, measurement and cross-channel reporting.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“the most practical mid-market fit right now is a syndicated panel + fast custom polling combo, with GWI as the core profiling layer.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose GWI or YouGov if you need deep audience profiling, psychographics, and attitudinal data” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid: Enterprise tools like Qualtrics unless you have dedicated research staff—they're often overkill and overpriced” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Rather than recommending a single, bloated enterprise platform like Qualtrics (which can easily eat up $50k+ of your budget)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Move to Qualtrics only if you have the resources to run continuous, statistically rigorous experience research internally.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Qualtrics as the strongest all-around consumer insights and audience research platform.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Qualtrics if you need structured, enterprise-grade feedback collection and CX management.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.