AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence

61Judge labels
0First choices
24Negative labels
13 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Audience insights for mid-market buyers
Rank 23 of 155 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 24% of its 17 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In audience insights · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing0%23 of 15524%17accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash02013
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000202
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01113
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02024
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00101
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative22 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained10 labelsNone
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Brandwatch or Pulsar if: You need to monitor real-time conversations, track brand sentiment over time” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Audience insights · scale prompt · alternative
“Choose Brandwatch, Meltwater, or Talkwalker if your priority is real-time social listening” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Audience insights · comparative prompt · alternative
“An enterprise-grade social listening and consumer intelligence platform.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Audience insights · comparative prompt · alternative
“Often considered the gold standard for deep semantic analysis.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Audience insights · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Many platform users report steep learning curves (e.g., Brandwatch's Boolean queries, Adobe's complexity)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Audience insights · scale prompt · soft negative
“Boolean-Heavy Social Listening Tools (e.g., Brandwatch/Cision): ... "overwhelms new users,"” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Audience insights · negative prompt · soft negative
“Unlike expensive enterprise tools (like GWI or Brandwatch) that cost thousands a month” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Audience insights · budget prompt · soft negative
“often out of reach, as they can cost tens of thousands of dollars annually” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Audience insights · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence, over the 61 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
GWI48 of 6112Not among the top eight
Meltwater37 of 611Not among the top eight
Audiense32 of 615Not among the top eight
SparkToro23 of 6110Not among the top eight
Qualtrics22 of 613Not among the top eight
Sprinklr Insights19 of 610Not among the top eight
YouGov Profiles17 of 613Not among the top eight
Talkwalker16 of 610Not among the top eight
Adobe Analytics13 of 610Not among the top eight
Google Analytics 412 of 611Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 61 answers that named Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com36
learn.g2.com32
g2.com27
pulsarplatform.com26
britopian.com24
us.fitgap.com22
meltwater.com20
youscan.io19
gartner.com18
gitnux.org15

239 of the 239 domain citations in answers naming Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

brandwatch.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence takes 0% of first choices and SparkToro takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “audience insights platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best audience insights platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
40 a month (“brandwatch consumer intelligence”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 119,214 a month
Searches its site ranks for
22,389 · 580 in the top three
Sites linking to it
26,367
Paid Google search
4 searches its ads show for, about 28 clicks and $585 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 120 text · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2022, as Falcon Social, Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 12 in the year, 108 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 155 in audience insights
Segment leader
19%
SparkToro
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
61 answers
Its own site cited
in 57 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on brandwatch.com
7,055
subdomains included
Content
1,768
counted in the table below
Documentation
138
Product · Integration
23 · 18
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog97682026-09-28Social media, SEO
Report or ebook27402025-10-10Social media
Webinar or virtual event27112026-07-15Social media
News or press12402026-04-01Content marketing, Influencer
Case study9622026-09-16
Comparison1002025-12-09
Glossary or explainer902025-11-05
Conference or event602020-08-10
Podcast or video2undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page brandwatch.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name social media (11); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence; a claim can dispute any of them.
Brandwatch 15Brandwatch (Cision) 1Brandwatch (Consumer Research) 1

Follow Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Brandwatch is the company behind Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Brighton and Hove, United Kingdom
Founded
2005

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at brandwatch.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.