AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Sprinklr Insights · October 2026 Edition
Sprinklr · 1 category · Ranked

Sprinklr Insights

27Judge labels
1First choices
11Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Audience insights for enterprise buyers
Rank 40 of 155 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In audience insights · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sprinklr Insights for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing0%40 of 1550%3under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sprinklr Insights yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sprinklr Insights across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you need to handle a PR crisis or find micro-influencers: Choose Brandwatch or Sprinklr.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Audience insights · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: Enterprise unified customer experience” Kimi K2 · Audience insights · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sprinklr Insights, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sprinklr Insights was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Brandwatch Consumer Intelligence19 of 271Not among the top eight
Meltwater17 of 272Not among the top eight
GWI16 of 276Not among the top eight
Qualtrics12 of 273Not among the top eight
Talkwalker12 of 271Not among the top eight
Audiense10 of 271Not among the top eight
YouGov Profiles7 of 272Not among the top eight
Kantar7 of 270Not among the top eight
NielsenIQ6 of 270Not among the top eight
Medallia5 of 271Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sprinklr Insights. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 27 answers that named Sprinklr Insights and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com14
guideflow.com14
britopian.com10
learn.g2.com10
pulsarplatform.com10
gartner.com9
youscan.io9
meltwater.com8
sprinklr.comYour site8
gitnux.org7

Ninety-one of the ninety-nine domain citations in answers naming Sprinklr Insights came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sprinklr.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sprinklr Insights takes 0% of first choices and SparkToro takes 19%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “audience insights platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best audience insights platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
30 a month (“sprinklr insights”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its company's site
sprinklr.com shared with Sprinklr's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 331,213 a month
Searches its site ranks for
33,325 · 2,048 in the top three
Sites linking to it
21,185
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
12 ads · 12 text · 4 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2022, as Sprinklr, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 8 in the year, 4 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 40 of 155 in audience insights
Segment leader
19%
SparkToro
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
27 answers
Its own site cited
in 25 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Sprinklr Insights

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sprinklr Insights; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sprinklr 2

Follow Sprinklr Insights

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sprinklr is the company behind Sprinklr Insights.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
New York City, United States
Founded
2009
Ownership
Public, CXM on New York Stock Exchange

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
See how Sprinklr Insights leads brands by turning customer data into actionable insights and new opportunities at scale.
Price stated
Get Pricing & Personalized Demo sprinklr.com/demo-sprinklr-insights
Free plan or trial
kostenlosen, personalisierten Demo von Sprinklr Insights sprinklr.com/de/demo-sprinklr-insights
Certifications
Sprinklr named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Social Media Management & Listening.Sprinklr Recognized as a Leader in the 2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Voice of Customer PlatformsSprinklr Insights is Top Rated on TrustRadius.Sprinklr、2025 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Voice of Customer Platformsでリーダーに選出Sprinklr InsightsがTrustRadiusで最高評価を獲得
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers

What Sprinklr Insights's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sprinklr.com/demo-sprinklr-insights, sprinklr.com/de/demo-sprinklr-insights, sprinklr.com/fr/demo-sprinklr-insights, sprinklr.com/ar/demo-sprinklr-insights, sprinklr.com/jp/demo-sprinklr-insights. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sprinklr Insights's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sprinklr Insights, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sprinklr Insights by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sprinklr Insights is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sprinklr Insights, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sprinklr.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.