| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 4% | 9 of 104 | 42% | 33 | criticized challenger |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 53 of 158 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Qualtrics or Medallia if you need enterprise-grade CX management, advanced analytics, and large-scale governance.” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · comparative prompt · first choice
“The best NPS and customer experience survey tools for mid-sized B2B companies include ... Medallia” Llama 4 Maverick · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For Enterprise CX Programs: Qualtrics or Medallia, but budget $50K-$300K+ annually” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need enterprise depth ($25K–$50K/year): Qualtrics, Medallia, or InMoment” Kimi K2 · Feedback · scale prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Built for global conglomerates. Avoid unless you have a massive CX budget and dedicated platform administrators.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“Overhyped Enterprise Tools: Like Medallia/InMoment—expensive, complex for non-experts.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“Another enterprise giant, Medallia is criticized for prohibitively high costs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“pure B2C tools like Medallia unless you have specific enterprise requirements” Kimi K2 · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 127 answers that named Medallia and are not a share of its labels.
Sixty-two of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Medallia came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Medallia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Medallia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at medallia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.