GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Medallia · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Medallia

127Judge labels
9First choices
45Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Feedback for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 104 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 42% of its 33 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Medallia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Customer feedback and surveysCustomer4%9 of 10442%33criticized challenger
Customer intelligence and data scienceGTM data and infrastructure0%53 of 15825%8under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Medallia yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Medallia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500202
GPT-5.4 mini12003
Gemini 3.5 Flash01045
Perplexity Sonar10113
Grok 4.1 Fast01124
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01045
Llama 4 Maverick11103
Qwen 3.7 Flash01113
Kimi K211035
GLM 4.7 FlashX10113
MiniMax M2.511103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct19 labels2
Paraphrase17 labels3
Comparative33 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels2
Scale-constrained18 labels2
Negative27 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative127 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Qualtrics or Medallia if you need enterprise-grade CX management, advanced analytics, and large-scale governance.” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · comparative prompt · first choice
“The best NPS and customer experience survey tools for mid-sized B2B companies include ... Medallia” Llama 4 Maverick · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For Enterprise CX Programs: Qualtrics or Medallia, but budget $50K-$300K+ annually” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you need enterprise depth ($25K–$50K/year): Qualtrics, Medallia, or InMoment” Kimi K2 · Feedback · scale prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Built for global conglomerates. Avoid unless you have a massive CX budget and dedicated platform administrators.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“Overhyped Enterprise Tools: Like Medallia/InMoment—expensive, complex for non-experts.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“Another enterprise giant, Medallia is criticized for prohibitively high costs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“pure B2C tools like Medallia unless you have specific enterprise requirements” Kimi K2 · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Medallia, over the 127 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Medallia was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Qualtrics120 of 12723Not in the top three
SurveyMonkey69 of 1277Not in the top three
Typeform45 of 1272Not in the top three
InMoment37 of 1270Not in the top three
Survicate34 of 1274Not in the top three
Alchemer30 of 1271Not in the top three
SurveySparrow27 of 1273Not in the top three
CustomerGauge21 of 12713Not in the top three
Chattermill21 of 1270Not in the top three
Pendo21 of 1270Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Medallia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 127 answers that named Medallia and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getperspective.ai11
zonkafeedback.com11
enterpret.com7
customergauge.com6
greatquestion.co6
medallia.comYour site6
typeform.com6
chattermill.com5
deeto.com5
gartner.com5

Sixty-two of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Medallia came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Medallia.
Website
medallia.com
Headquarters
Palo Alto, United States
Founded
2001

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Medallia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Medallia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at medallia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack