Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 of 83, unchanged
3 categories · Named, not rankedEnterpret
25Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
7 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Enterpret was named 7 times in Feedback and 2 other categories, where CustomerGauge led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business35 of 85
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market31 of 84
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise14 of 68
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
In feedback · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Enterpret for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 0% | 31 of 84 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 43 of 142 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 0% | 65 of 92 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Enterpret held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Feedback · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 30 of 81
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 → 14 of 64
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feedback | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 31 of 84 |
| Customer intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 43 of 142 |
| Reviews | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 48 → 65 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Enterpret across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Enterpret across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Ranked highly for analysis depth, channel breadth, and tying feedback to revenue.” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
“For deeper customer feedback analysis, Enterpret is a top choice” Mistral Small · Customer intel · direct prompt · alternative
“Enterpret unifies and analyzes the feedback you *already* have.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Enterpret, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enterpret was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Enterpret, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enterpret was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enterpret. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named Enterpret and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
enterpret.comYour site17
chattermill.com14
blog.hubspot.com10
learn.g2.com10
guideflow.com9
getperspective.ai8
typeform.com8
zonkafeedback.com8
zendesk.com7
thecxlead.com6
Eighty of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming Enterpret came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
enterpret.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Enterpret takes 0% of first choices and CustomerGauge takes 24%.ShowHide
Search and answers
enterpret.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Enterpret takes 0% of first choices and CustomerGauge takes 24%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer feedback and survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best customer feedback and survey platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“enterpret”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 859 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 422 · 11 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 968
- Paid Google search
- 3 searches its ads show for, about 14 clicks and $116 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 31 of 84 in feedback
Segment leader
24%
CustomerGauge
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 25 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on enterpret.com
1,496
subdomains included
Content
1,076
counted in the table below
Documentation
157
Product · Integration
39 · 56
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 758 | undated | Product analytics, Customer success | ||
| Blog | 266 | 0 | 2026-01-21 | Enrichment | |
| Comparison | 26 | undated | |||
| Case study | 14 | 1 | 2026-08-10 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 5 | 0 | 2024-11-22 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-08-10How elevenlabs outgrew internal solutions to turn customer feedback into product decisions case study
- 2026-05-29Wispr flow enterpret how a support team became engineerings frontline case study
- 2026-04-21Apollo case study
- 2026-04-21Bitvavo case study
- 2026-04-21Boll and branch case study
- 2026-04-21Canva case study
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page enterpret.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Enterpret
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Enterpret is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Enterpret is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Customer intelligence platform | AI Infrastructure
- For
- product, customer experience, support, operations, and GTM teams at high-velocity product organizations
- Price stated
- $0 enterpret.com
- Starting price
- 0 enterpret.com
- Free plan or trial
- No commitment required enterpret.com
- Integrations claimed
- 50 enterpret.com
- Customers named
- Apollo.ioVimeoDescriptSamsung FoodBoll & BranchFeeldNotionCanva
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Enterpret's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: enterpret.com, trust.enterpret.com, enterpret.com/solutions/product, enterpret.com/customers, enterpret.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enterpret's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enterpret, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Enterpret by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Enterpret is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Enterpret, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.