Every category where a model named Survicate for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer feedback and surveys	Customer	7%	4 of 104	3%	37	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Survicate yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Survicate across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	2	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	5	0	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2	0	4
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	1	1	5
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	2	0	3
Kimi K2	1	1	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	1	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	1	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels6

Paraphrase14 labels4

Comparative18 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels1

Scale-constrained11 labels3

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative79 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“is SurveySparrow, Survicate, or QuestionPro, as they offer the best value for mid-market teams” Llama 4 Maverick · Feedback · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Survicate as the top NPS and customer experience survey tool.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Start with Survicate if you want a comprehensive platform” Kimi K2 · Feedback · direct prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: Survicate” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Decent starting point, but pricing gets unpredictable and restrictive as you scale.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Survicate, over the 79 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Survicate was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SurveyMonkey54 of 796Not in the top three

Qualtrics49 of 799Not in the top three

Typeform47 of 794Not in the top three

SurveySparrow37 of 793Not in the top three

Medallia34 of 795Not in the top three

Google Forms31 of 798Not in the top three

Hotjar28 of 790Not in the top three

Canny22 of 790Not in the top three

Delighted22 of 790Not in the top three

Zonka Feedback21 of 791Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Survicate. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 79 answers that named Survicate and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

typeform.com7

guideflow.com6

surveysparrow.com6

zonkafeedback.com6

proprofssurvey.com5

qualaroo.com5

thecxlead.com5

survicate.comYour site4

blog.hubspot.com3

customergauge.com3

Forty-six of the fifty domain citations in answers naming Survicate came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools6

typeform.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools6

proprofssurvey.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools4

surveysparrow.com/blog/customer-satisfaction-survey-tools4

blog.hubspot.com/service/customer-feedback-tool3

customergauge.com/what-is-nps-software3

featurebase.app/blog/customer-feedback-tools3

qualaroo.com/blog/best-customer-feedback-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Survicate's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Survicate, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at survicate.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.