| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 4% | 10 of 104 | 46% | 24 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Best All-Rounder (Ease + Integrations): Delighted ... Start with Delimited or Pulseeble if you just want NPS.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with AskNicely or Delighted” MiniMax M2.5 · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“simple to set up, highly polished, and perfect for teams that want quick, beautiful NPS/CSAT campaigns” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feedback · scale prompt · alternative
“Fastest path to running automated NPS/CSAT programs with minimal configuration” Kimi K2 · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“it is recommended to avoid or be cautious about using Delighted and GetFeedback Direct” Llama 4 Maverick · Feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“Delighted, previously a popular affordable alternative, officially shut down” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Feedback · budget prompt · hard negative
“Delighted is no longer available as standalone (absorbed by Qualtrics)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Delighted (formerly popular) shut down in June 2026.” Kimi K2 · Feedback · direct prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 46 answers that named Delighted and are not a share of its labels.
Forty-five of the forty-five domain citations in answers naming Delighted came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Delighted's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Delighted, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at delighted.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.