Every category where a model named SurveySparrow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer feedback and surveys	Customer	5%	5 of 104	6%	32	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SurveySparrow yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SurveySparrow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2	0	4
Mistral Small	0	4	0	0	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	3	1	0	5
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	1	3
Kimi K2	0	4	0	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	1	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labels4

Paraphrase11 labels2

Comparative9 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels2

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative14 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SurveySparrow generally offers the strongest combination of affordable pricing, CX-specific features, and scalability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Feedback · budget prompt · first choice

“The best customer feedback and survey platform for a mid-market B2B company is SurveySparrow, Survicate, or QuestionPro” Llama 4 Maverick · Feedback · direct prompt · first choice

“If you can spend ~$20/month: SurveySparrow is the best value” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · budget prompt · first choice

“SurveySparrow suits small teams running recurring feedback programs like quarterly NPS or employee pulse surveys.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Feedback · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it feels more like a broader survey platform than a dedicated CX operating system” GPT-5.4 mini · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“complaints about pricing at higher tiers” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Feedback · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SurveySparrow, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SurveySparrow was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Qualtrics42 of 588Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey41 of 584Not in the top three

Survicate37 of 587Not in the top three

Typeform30 of 581Not in the top three

Medallia27 of 584Not in the top three

Google Forms24 of 5812Not in the top three

Jotform19 of 581Not in the top three

Delighted18 of 580Not in the top three

AskNicely14 of 581Not in the top three

Zonka Feedback13 of 580Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SurveySparrow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 58 answers that named SurveySparrow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

proprofssurvey.com4

thecxlead.com4

qualaroo.com3

surveysparrow.comYour site3

typeform.com3

customergauge.com2

feedbackrobot.com2

g2.com2

guideflow.com2

helply.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming SurveySparrow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

proprofssurvey.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools3

thecxlead.com/tools/best-feedback-management-tools3

typeform.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools3

g2.com/products/surveysparrow/pricing2

guideflow.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools2

helply.com/blog/customer-satisfaction-survey-tools2

qualaroo.com/blog/survey-software-for-small-businesses2

sogolytics.com/blog/best-online-survey-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SurveySparrow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SurveySparrow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at surveysparrow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.