| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer feedback and surveys | Customer | 16% | 2 of 84 | 18% | 28 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 15% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Event lead capture apps | Marketing | 2% | 21 of 70 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Blinq at 23% | |
| Event management platforms | Marketing | 0% | 22 of 81 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Bizzabo at 28% | |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 102 of 172 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% | |
| Order management systems | Revenue operations | 0% | 51 of 131 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Zoho Inventory at 25% | |
| Webinar and virtual event platforms | Marketing | 0% | 45 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 25% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Event lead capture | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 21 of 70, unchanged |
| Feedback | 15% | 16% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 15% → 16%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 → 2 of 84 |
| Event management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 22 of 81, unchanged |
| Market intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 102 of 172, unchanged |
| Order management | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 131, unchanged |
| Webinars | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 67, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with Google Forms if you have a truly limited budget. It's completely free, has no response limits” Kimi K2 · Feedback · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Google Forms (if very basic needs) or HubSpot Free + a simple form tool” MiniMax M2.5 · Event lead capture · budget prompt · first choice
“Google Forms is the best customer feedback and survey platform for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · Feedback · budget prompt · first choice
“Google Forms – Best free option, with unlimited responses and basic analytics.” Mistral Small · Feedback · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Why avoid: ... generic QR-code forms (Google Forms, Typeform)... Web-only solutions require a continuous, strong internet connection” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Event lead capture · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid this for professional customer feedback.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“excellent entry-level tool ... though it lacks advanced features like real-time reporting or customization options” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Feedback · comparative prompt · soft negative
“you are too large for basic, siloed survey tools (like Google Forms or basic Typeform accounts)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Feedback · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 103 answers that named Google Forms and are not a share of its labels.
306 of the 306 domain citations in answers naming Google Forms came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
What Google Forms's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: google.com/forms/about, google.com/intl/af/forms/about, google.com/intl/id/forms/about, google.com/intl/ms/forms/about, google.com/intl/ca/forms/about. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Forms's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Forms, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Forms by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Google Forms is among the products AI models recommend first in Customer feedback and surveys this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.