| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 18% | 1 of 92 | 18% | 49 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 26% → 20%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Local listings management | Marketing | 2% | 9 of 65 | 12% | 34 | accepted challenger | |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 2% | 16 of 124 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Referral and partner programs | Partner and channel | 0% | 112 of 112 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 22% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 39 of 87 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13% | |
| Loyalty, advocacy and referrals | Marketing | 0% | 48 of 110 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 0% | 67 of 80 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| SMS and WhatsApp marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 47 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 26% | 20% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 26% → 20%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 92, unchanged |
| Local listings | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 9 of 65, unchanged |
| Channel marketing | 4% | 2% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 16 of 124 |
| Referrals | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 95 → 112 of 112 |
| Conversational mktg | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 87, unchanged |
| Loyalty | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 48 of 110 |
| Mobile & push | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 67 of 80, unchanged |
| SMS & WhatsApp | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 111, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 10 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“AI-powered "agentic" platform – AI agents execute complex workflows across reviews, listings, messaging, surveys, and competitor analysis at scale” Kimi K2 · Reviews · comparative prompt · first choice
“Differentiator: Most comprehensive unified CX suite with deep AI automation capabilities; scales from 5 to 500+ locations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for enterprise/multi-location businesses... highest-rated for scale; Birdeye leads with AI agents/workflows” Grok 4.20 · Reviews · comparative prompt · first choice
“Top-rated alternatives (low complaints): Birdeye, Podium, ReviewGrower, BrightLocal—praised for reliability” Grok 4.20 · Reviews · negative prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“G2 reviews cite constant crashes, slow setup, unresponsive support, and users describing it as "the worst functioning platform I have ever used"” Kimi K2 · Referrals · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequent reports of constant crashes, slow setup processes, and unresponsive support (G2 reviews).” Grok 4.20 · Referrals · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to AVOID if You Have a Limited Budget ... Birdeye and Podium” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Reviews · budget prompt · hard negative
“Stay away from Podium and Birdeye if budget is a concern” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 302 of the 316 answers that named Birdeye and are not a share of its labels.
737 of the 912 domain citations in answers naming Birdeye came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 47,745 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 201 | 0 | 2026-03-23 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 139 | 0 | 2024-03-21 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 138 | 3 | 2026-07-30 | ||
| News or press | 130 | 0 | 2024-05-22 | ||
| Case study | 103 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 91 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 71 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 34 | 0 | 2026-03-26 | ||
| Podcast or video | 23 | undated |
Every page birdeye.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Birdeye's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: birdeye.com, birdeye.com/pricing, trust.birdeye.com, birdeye.com/platform, birdeye.com/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Birdeye's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Birdeye, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Birdeye by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Birdeye first in Review and reputation management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.