Every category where a model named Yext for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Review and reputation management	Marketing	0%	31 of 103	15%	13	accepted challenger
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	108 of 108	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Yext yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Yext across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative19 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative52 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Yext if your priority is listing accuracy + review management across directories” GPT-5.4 mini · Reviews · direct prompt · alternative

“Need local SEO + citations + reviews? → BrightLocal or Yext.” GPT-5.4 mini · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative

“from $149/month for 5 locations, strong listing management” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“require a call for pricing, making budgeting difficult for small businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Reviews · negative prompt · soft negative

“But it's pricey (est. $199–499+/mo) and reviewers flag contract rigidity.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“more affordable than Yext ($199–$499+/month, enterprise-focused)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Channel marketing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“it is notorious for aggressive sales tactics and high costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Reviews · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Yext, over the 52 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Yext was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Birdeye35 of 5217Not in the top three

Reputation32 of 525Not in the top three

Podium24 of 520Not in the top three

ReviewTrackers22 of 521Not in the top three

SOCi20 of 523Not in the top three

BrightLocal13 of 520Not in the top three

NiceJob10 of 521Not in the top three

ReviewGrower8 of 521Not in the top three

GatherUp8 of 520Not in the top three

Grade.us8 of 520Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Yext. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 52 answers that named Yext and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com8

birdeye.com6

appfollow.io5

gartner.com5

usa.inquirer.net5

guideflow.com4

ranked.solutions4

estatehub.io3

reviewoverhaul.com3

thecmo.com3

Forty-six of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Yext came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

appfollow.io/blog/reputation-management-software5

g2.com/categories/online-reputation-management5

usa.inquirer.net/191823/best-reputation-management-software5

gartner.com/reviews/market/online-reputation-management-software4

ranked.solutions/rankings/review-management-software4

estatehub.io/articles/reputation-management-software-user-reviews3

alchemer.com/resources/blog/the-best-review-management-software-how-to-take-control-of-you2

almcorp.com/blog/top-reputation-management-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Yext.

Website: yext.com
Headquarters: New York City, United States
Founded: 2006
Ownership: Public, YEXT on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Yext's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Yext, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at yext.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.