Every category where a model named Semrush Local for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Local listings management	Marketing	4%	5 of 65	13%	31	accepted challenger
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	69 of 124	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Semrush Local yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Semrush Local across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	1	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	1	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.20	0	3	0	0	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Kimi K2	0	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	4	0	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	0	4	0	0	4
GPT-6 Luna	0	1	1	1	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labels1

Paraphrase21 labels1

Comparative21 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd most likely recommend Semrush Local as the default choice.” GPT-5.4 mini · Local listings · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“adding Semrush Local is almost always the most efficient path” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Local listings · direct prompt · first choice

“The integration with your existing keyword and competitive research data reduces tool sprawl, though multi-location workflows aren't as robust” Kimi K2 · Local listings · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Pros: Comprehensive SEO toolkit, includes listings management - Cons: Less focused on just listings” MiniMax M2.5 · Local listings · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Semrush Local Pro is another option, but it's listed at $60/month per location billed annually, so it costs more for listings management alone.” GPT-6 Luna · Local listings · budget prompt · soft negative

“though it may lack some of the advanced enterprise workflow permissions of a standalone Yext/Uberall” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Local listings · scale prompt · soft negative

“Semrush Local starts at $30/mo per location billed annually ... but these are generally pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · Local listings · budget prompt · soft negative

“treat it as a tool to evaluate carefully if listings accuracy is your top priority” Perplexity Sonar · Local listings · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Semrush Local, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Semrush Local was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BrightLocal68 of 7637Compare →

Yext64 of 7615Compare →

Moz Local49 of 7610Compare →

Uberall37 of 763Compare →

Birdeye34 of 762Compare →

Synup23 of 761Compare →

Whitespark14 of 761Compare →

SOCi10 of 760Not among the top eight

Google Business Profile5 of 761Not among the top eight

Localo4 of 761Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Semrush Local. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 76 answers that named Semrush Local and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brightlocal.com44

guideflow.com41

g2.com34

birdeye.com32

semrush.comYour site25

thestacc.com23

widewail.com23

nathanojaokomo.com18

gbppromote.com15

uberall.com15

245 of the 270 domain citations in answers naming Semrush Local came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/local-listing-management-software-tools34

brightlocal.com/resources/listings-management-services-compared29

widewail.com/blog/best-local-business-listings-management-tools-and-services23

birdeye.com/blog/local-listing-management-tools20

nathanojaokomo.com/blog/best-local-seo-tools18

brightlocal.com/about-us/how-we-compare16

brightlocal.com/pricing14

cybernews.com/marketing-tools/best-listings-management-solutions14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Semrush Local stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 210 a month (“semrush local”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Its own site: It sits on Semrush's site (semrush.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 5 of 65 in local listings

Segment leader

33%

BrightLocal

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 76 answers
Its own site cited: in 71 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Semrush Local

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Semrush Local; a claim can dispute any of them.

Semrush 10Semrush Local (powered by Yext/MapLabs) 1Semrush Local Business 1Semrush Local Pro 1

Follow Semrush Local

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Semrush is the company behind Semrush Local.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: semrush.com
Headquarters: Boston, United States
Founded: 2008
Ownership: Public, SEMR on New York Stock Exchange
Also from Semrush: SEMrush SEO Writing Assistant, SEMrush Standard AI Toolkit, Semrush .Trends, Semrush AI PR Pro, Semrush AI PR Toolkit, Semrush AI Visibility Checker, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, Semrush AIO Enterprise and 11 more

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Compare Semrush Local Toolkit plans to manage listings, track local rankings, monitor reviews, and improve your business visibility online.
semrush.com/pricing/local
For: local businesses
semrush.com/apps/local-seo
Price stated: Base: $30/mo per location, billed annually; Pro: $60/mo per location, billed annually; Business: Let’s talk / Contact sales semrush.com/pricing/local
Starting price: $30/mo per location semrush.com/pricing/local
Free plan or trial: Try Semrush free for seven days. Cancel anytime. semrush.com/pricing/local
Customers named: WixVodafone GroupMonash UniversitySkyscannerRock ContentSmileworks LiverpoolSam the (local) concrete manPastreez
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, certifications, hosting

What Semrush Local's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: agencies.semrush.com/seo-local-berlin-seo-agentur, semrush.com/pricing/local, semrush.com/apps/local-seo, semrush.com/features/local-seo, agencies.semrush.com/list/local-seo. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Semrush Local's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Semrush Local, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Semrush Local by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Semrush Local is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Semrush Local, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.