AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Local listings › Semrush Local vs Uberall
Local listings management · October 2026 Edition

Semrush Local vs Uberall

One of fourteen models named Semrush Local first on the direct prompt; zero named Uberall. Semrush Local was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Uberall by thirteen and Semrush Local carries 31 labels and Uberall 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Semrush Local

accepted challenger

By Semrush, Boston, United States, founded 2008. Named in two categories this edition.

Uberall

accepted challenger

Berlin, Germany, founded 2013. Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate13%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels3136A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Semrush Local reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Synup was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. BrightLocal vs Semrush Local · BrightLocal vs Uberall · Moz Local vs Semrush Local

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the local listings management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Semrush LocalFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUberall
Direct10
Paraphrase10
Comparative01
Budget-constrained002 against Semrush Local · 3 against Uberall
Scale-constrained011 against Semrush Local
Negative001 against Semrush Local · 1 against Uberall
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Semrush Local and Uberall were named in the same answer thirty-seven times, of the 76 answers naming Semrush Local and the 133 naming Uberall. In those answers Uberall took the first choice three times and Semrush Local zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Semrush Local and Uberall stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Semrush Local Uberall first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Semrush Local on the left and Uberall on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Semrush Local and Uberall stood in it.

Semrush Local first, Uberall not the choice

1 of 14 modelsUberall was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashSemrush Local alternatives: BrightLocal, Synup, Whitespark

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniYext alternatives: Uberall
Perplexity SonarSynup alternatives: BrightLocal, Semrush Listing Management, Uberall, Yext
DeepSeek V4 FlashBrightLocal alternatives: Semrush Local, Synup, Uberall
Qwen 3.7 FlashSynup alternatives: BrightLocal, Uberall
GLM 4.7 FlashXBrightLocal alternatives: LocaliQ, Semrush Local, Yext

Neither was named

8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Yext alternatives: Birdeye, BrightLocal, SOCi, Synup
Grok 4.1 FastBrightLocal alternatives: Moz Local, Synup, Yext
Mistral SmallBirdeye, Yext alternatives: Moz Local, Synup
Llama 4 MaverickBrightLocal Track, Synup alternatives: Birdeye, Moz Local, Yext
Kimi K2BrightLocal alternatives: SOCi, Semrush Listing Management, Synup
MiniMax M2.5BrightLocal alternatives: Synup, Yext
GPT-6 LunaBrightLocal alternatives: Yext
Muse Glimmer 30BBrightLocal, Synup alternatives: Semrush Listing Management

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Semrush Local0%#5 of 9
Uberall0%#8 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Semrush Local leads by two points.
Semrush Local4%#5 of 10
Uberall2%#7 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Uberall leads at enterprise.
Uberall15%#2 of 9
Semrush Local0%#6 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Semrush Local

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Semrush Local Pro is another option, but it's listed at $60/month per location billed annually, so it costs more for listings management alone.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“though it may lack some of the advanced enterprise workflow permissions of a standalone Yext/Uberall” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Semrush Local starts at $30/mo per location billed annually ... but these are generally pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd most likely recommend Semrush Local as the default choice.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“adding Semrush Local is almost always the most efficient path” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“The integration with your existing keyword and competitive research data reduces tool sprawl, though multi-location workflows aren't as robust” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · alternative

What the models said about Uberall

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Uberall is positioned for "growth at scale" and uses request-based pricing for some plans ... but these are generally pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“like Yext or Uberall) are designed for large enterprises and franchises. They are expensive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“generally cost more and are better suited to larger budgets or multi-location enterprises” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Uberall is positioned as built for multi-location brands to control, optimize and protect listings across 150+ directories.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Yext or Uberall for enterprise‑grade automation, compliance, and direct publisher integrations.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for distributing data to a vast number of obscure directories/APIs. | Interface can be complex; pricier than BrightLocal.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.