Whitespark vs Uberall
Zero of fourteen models named Whitespark first on the direct prompt; zero named Uberall. Whitespark was named by nine of the fourteen models and Uberall by thirteen and Whitespark carries 18 labels and Uberall 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Berlin, Germany, founded 2013. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the local listings management page.
By framing
WhitesparkFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUberall
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Whitespark and Uberall were named in the same answer twenty times, of the 42 answers naming Whitespark and the 133 naming Uberall. In those answers Uberall took the first choice three times and Whitespark two.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Whitespark Uberall first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Whitespark on the left and Uberall on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Whitespark4%#4 of 9Uberall0%#8 of 9Uberall15%#2 of 9Whitespark0%#– of 9What the models said about Whitespark
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“"BrightLocal and Whitespark are okay, but they toss you into a lot of really low quality, trashy directories."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“limited features beyond ranking/reporting, so it may not be enough if you need full listings governance” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Not a full listings management platform — more of a specialized citation tool.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“The Best "One-Time Fee" Option: Whitespark ... It is the most cost-effective way to get a clean, highly authoritative listing footprint without a recurring software bill.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Whitespark stands out as one of the most affordable local listings management platforms, with entry-level pricing as low as $1/month” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Select tools like Whitespark or BrightLocal build listings manually and give you full ownership of the accounts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
What the models said about Uberall
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Uberall is positioned for "growth at scale" and uses request-based pricing for some plans ... but these are generally pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“like Yext or Uberall) are designed for large enterprises and franchises. They are expensive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“generally cost more and are better suited to larger budgets or multi-location enterprises” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Uberall is positioned as built for multi-location brands to control, optimize and protect listings across 150+ directories.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Yext or Uberall for enterprise‑grade automation, compliance, and direct publisher integrations.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for distributing data to a vast number of obscure directories/APIs. | Interface can be complex; pricier than BrightLocal.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.