AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Marketing › Local listings › BrightLocal vs Uberall
Local listings management · October 2026 Edition

BrightLocal vs Uberall

Seven of fourteen models named BrightLocal first on the direct prompt; zero named Uberall. BrightLocal was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Uberall by thirteen and BrightLocal carries 58 labels and Uberall 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.

BrightLocal

endorsed leader

Named in three categories this edition.

Uberall

accepted challenger

Berlin, Germany, founded 2013. Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share33%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels5836A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, BrightLocal reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Synup was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. BrightLocal vs Moz Local · BrightLocal vs Synup · BrightLocal vs Yext

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the local listings management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BrightLocalFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUberall
Direct70
Paraphrase601 against BrightLocal
Comparative61
Budget-constrained403 against BrightLocal · 3 against Uberall
Scale-constrained01
Negative302 against BrightLocal · 1 against Uberall
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, BrightLocal and Uberall were named in the same answer eighty-two times, of the 217 answers naming BrightLocal and the 133 naming Uberall. In those answers Uberall took the first choice ten times and BrightLocal twenty-eight.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where BrightLocal and Uberall stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
BrightLocal Uberall first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, BrightLocal on the left and Uberall on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where BrightLocal and Uberall stood in it.

BrightLocal first, Uberall an alternative

7 of 14 modelsUberall was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastBrightLocal alternatives: Moz Local, Synup, Yext
DeepSeek V4 FlashBrightLocal alternatives: Semrush Local, Synup, Uberall
Kimi K2BrightLocal alternatives: SOCi, Semrush Listing Management, Synup
GLM 4.7 FlashXBrightLocal alternatives: LocaliQ, Semrush Local, Yext
MiniMax M2.5BrightLocal alternatives: Synup, Yext
GPT-6 LunaBrightLocal alternatives: Yext
Muse Glimmer 30BBrightLocal, Synup alternatives: Semrush Listing Management

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Yext alternatives: Birdeye, BrightLocal, SOCi, Synup
GPT-5.4 miniYext alternatives: Uberall
Gemini 3.5 FlashSemrush Local alternatives: BrightLocal, Synup, Whitespark
Perplexity SonarSynup alternatives: BrightLocal, Semrush Listing Management, Uberall, Yext
Qwen 3.7 FlashSynup alternatives: BrightLocal, Uberall

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallBirdeye, Yext alternatives: Moz Local, Synup
Llama 4 MaverickBrightLocal Track, Synup alternatives: Birdeye, Moz Local, Yext

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
BrightLocal leads by forty-six points.
BrightLocal46%#1 of 9
Uberall0%#8 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
BrightLocal leads by thirty-one points.
BrightLocal33%#1 of 10
Uberall2%#7 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Uberall leads at enterprise.
Uberall15%#2 of 9
BrightLocal0%#8 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about BrightLocal

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Platforms like BrightLocal offer free trials and low-cost monitoring tools, though their core automated publishing features usually require a paid plan.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“BrightLocal's citation services can be inexpensive on a per-listing basis, but it is not the cheapest all-in-one software option” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“"BrightLocal and Whitespark are okay, but they toss you into a lot of really low quality, trashy directories."” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“BrightLocal is the most well-rounded option, combining listings management with rank tracking, review monitoring, and audit tools.” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
“For a U.S. small business, I'd pick BrightLocal if you want an ongoing listings-management platform without paying enterprise prices.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
“The Best Overall: BrightLocal ... the gold standard for mid-sized companies managing 5 to 50+ locations.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Uberall

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Uberall is positioned for "growth at scale" and uses request-based pricing for some plans ... but these are generally pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“like Yext or Uberall) are designed for large enterprises and franchises. They are expensive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“generally cost more and are better suited to larger budgets or multi-location enterprises” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Uberall is positioned as built for multi-location brands to control, optimize and protect listings across 150+ directories.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Yext or Uberall for enterprise‑grade automation, compliance, and direct publisher integrations.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for distributing data to a vast number of obscure directories/APIs. | Interface can be complex; pricier than BrightLocal.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.