Synup vs Uberall
Four of fourteen models named Synup first on the direct prompt; zero named Uberall. Synup was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Uberall by thirteen and Synup carries 37 labels and Uberall 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Berlin, Germany, founded 2013. Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the local listings management page.
By framing
SynupFirst choices, of fourteen modelsUberall
Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Synup and Uberall were named in the same answer thirty-eight times, of the 73 answers naming Synup and the 133 naming Uberall. In those answers Uberall took the first choice three times and Synup four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | ||||
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Synup Uberall first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Synup on the left and Uberall on the right.The direct prompt
Synup first, Uberall an alternative
4 of 14 modelsUberall was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Uberall15%#2 of 9Synup0%#7 of 9What the models said about Synup
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Pricing shown is agency‑oriented; may be higher than very small‑business budgets.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“described as powerful, but with a significant learning curve” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“the strongest default choice is usually Synup if you need scalable multi-location control and centralized updates” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice
“If you want a dedicated, cost-effective listings + reputation stack with agency/white-label options: Synup” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“Moz Local and Synup are both highly recommended as affordable local listings management platforms” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Uberall
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Uberall is positioned for "growth at scale" and uses request-based pricing for some plans ... but these are generally pricier” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“like Yext or Uberall) are designed for large enterprises and franchises. They are expensive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“generally cost more and are better suited to larger budgets or multi-location enterprises” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Uberall is positioned as built for multi-location brands to control, optimize and protect listings across 150+ directories.” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Yext or Uberall for enterprise‑grade automation, compliance, and direct publisher integrations.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for distributing data to a vast number of obscure directories/APIs. | Interface can be complex; pricier than BrightLocal.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.