GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Uberall · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Uberall

11Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Uberall was named 3 times in Channel marketing and 2 other categories, where JourneyBee led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market93 of 108

under the label threshold

Enterprise51 of 93

under the label threshold

In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Uberall for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	93 of 108	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Retail, proximity and IoT marketing	Marketing	0%	107 of 131	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Radar at 19%
Review and reputation management	Marketing	0%	88 of 103	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Uberall yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Uberall across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“require a call for pricing, making budgeting difficult for small businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Reviews · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Uberall, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Uberall was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Yext7 of 111Not in the top three

SOCi6 of 110Not in the top three

Birdeye4 of 113Not in the top three

Kontakt.io3 of 112Not in the top three

Chatmeter3 of 110Not in the top three

GroundTruth3 of 110Not in the top three

Propulso3 of 110Not in the top three

Reputation3 of 110Not in the top three

Foursquare2 of 111Not in the top three

Bluedot2 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Uberall. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 11 answers that named Uberall and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com3

gartner.com2

thecmo.com2

adleverage.com1

appfollow.io1

avsystem.com1

beonic.com1

boxumer.com1

capterra.com1

consumer.ftc.gov1

Fourteen of the fourteen domain citations in answers naming Uberall came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

g2.com/categories/location-based-marketing2

adleverage.com/blog/the-biggest-reputation-management-mistakes-we-see-in-the-wild1

appfollow.io/blog/reputation-management-software1

avsystem.com/blog/linkyfi/proximity-marketing1

beonic.com/blog/proximity-marketing1

boxumer.com/en/fake-reviews1

capterra.com/reputation-management-software1

consumer.ftc.gov/consumer-alerts/2025/12/ftc-warns-businesses-about-fake-reviews1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Uberall.

Website: uberall.com
Headquarters: Berlin, Germany
Founded: 2013

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Uberall's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Uberall, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at uberall.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.