Every category where a model named Semrush Listing Management for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Local listings management	Marketing	0%	17 of 65	20%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Semrush Listing Management yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Semrush Listing Management across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	2	0	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“More limited directory coverage than Yext or Uberall; best as an add-on rather than a standalone listings specialist.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Local listings · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you already use Semrush for SEO/content and want listings inside the same suite: Semrush Listing Management” Muse Glimmer 30B · Local listings · direct prompt · alternative

“a solid option if you already use Semrush and want listings bundled into a broader SEO stack” Perplexity Sonar · Local listings · direct prompt · alternative

“SEMrush is ideal if you want listings management within a broader SEO platform.” Kimi K2 · Local listings · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“white-labeled tools (such as Semrush's local listing tool, which uses Yext's network in the background) will result in the same issues if you cancel” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Local listings · negative prompt · soft negative

“Requires full SEO suite subscription—you can't buy it standalone; slow support during peak times” Kimi K2 · Local listings · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Semrush Listing Management, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Semrush Listing Management was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

BrightLocal19 of 2112Not among the top eight

Yext19 of 212Not among the top eight

Moz Local16 of 217Not among the top eight

Uberall14 of 212Not among the top eight

Birdeye12 of 210Not among the top eight

Synup8 of 212Not among the top eight

Whitespark4 of 210Not among the top eight

Google Business Profile3 of 210Not among the top eight

SOCi3 of 210Not among the top eight

Bing Places2 of 210Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Semrush Listing Management. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Semrush Listing Management and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com16

birdeye.com14

brightlocal.com14

thestacc.com14

g2.com11

semrush.comYour site9

webfx.com8

widewail.com8

cybernews.com7

uberall.com7

Ninety-nine of the 108 domain citations in answers naming Semrush Listing Management came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/local-listing-management-software-tools15

birdeye.com/blog/local-listing-management-tools13

brightlocal.com/resources/listings-management-services-compared13

thestacc.com/best/local-listing-management-tools12

guideflow.com/blog/business-listing-management-software9

semrush.com/listings-management/start8

webfx.com/local-seo/learn/local-listing-management8

widewail.com/blog/best-local-business-listings-management-tools-and-services8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Semrush Listing Management stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“semrush listing management”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its own site: It sits on Semrush's site (semrush.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 17 of 65 in local listings

Segment leader

33%

BrightLocal

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 21 answers
Its own site cited: in 21 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Semrush Listing Management

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Semrush Listing Management; a claim can dispute any of them.

SEMrush Listing Management 1

Follow Semrush Listing Management

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Semrush is the company behind Semrush Listing Management.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: semrush.com
Headquarters: Boston, United States
Founded: 2008
Ownership: Public, SEMR on New York Stock Exchange
Also from Semrush: SEMrush SEO Writing Assistant, SEMrush Standard AI Toolkit, Semrush .Trends, Semrush AI PR Pro, Semrush AI PR Toolkit, Semrush AI Visibility Checker, Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit, Semrush AIO Enterprise and 11 more

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Semrush Listing Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Semrush Listing Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Semrush Listing Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Semrush Listing Management is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Semrush Listing Management, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.