| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR and media monitoring | Marketing | 20% | 2 of 65 | 5% | 38 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Go with Prowly ... It is the most practical and high-ROI choice for a growing mid-sized B2B marketing department.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The research consistently highlights Brand24 and Prowly as the top budget-friendly choices” Kimi K2 · PR · budget prompt · first choice
“The best press outreach and media monitoring tool for a mid-sized B2B company would be Prowly.” Llama 4 Maverick · PR · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best overall choice is usually Prowly if you want an all-in-one PR platform” Perplexity Sonar · PR · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Poor real-time alerts | Useless for crises | Hourly tools like BuzzSumo, Prowly, CoverageBook” Grok 4.1 Fast · PR · negative prompt · soft negative
“It is online-only and is not suited for broadcast coverage.” Perplexity Sonar · PR · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 93 answers that named Semrush AI PR Toolkit and are not a share of its labels.
Eighty-seven of the eighty-seven domain citations in answers naming Semrush AI PR Toolkit came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Semrush AI PR Toolkit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Semrush AI PR Toolkit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at semrush.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.