GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Mention · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Mention

81Judge labels
6First choices
16Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in PR for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 65 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 24 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In pr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Mention for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
PR and media monitoringMarketing4%6 of 6517%24accepted challenger
Social media managementMarketing0%22 of 590%2under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 37%
AI visibility and answer engine tracking toolsMarketing0%62 of 1190%1under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Mention yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Mention across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.512003
GPT-5.4 mini10102
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00112
Grok 4.1 Fast01113
Mistral Small00202
DeepSeek V4 Flash02024
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K211103
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.502103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct14 labels1
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative18 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels3
Scale-constrained7 labels1
Negative17 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative81 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 12 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Mention - This affordable tool for PR professionals tracks brand callouts across social platforms and the web” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PR · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall for a limited budget: Mention or Brand24” GPT-5.4 mini · PR · budget prompt · first choice
“Budget monitoring | Brand24, Mention, Awario” Kimi K2 · PR · negative prompt · first choice
“intuitive query builder that makes it easy to monitor millions of sources and analyze changes in mention volume” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“it has since eliminated its affordable plans (now ~$599/mo minimum). Most older articles recommending it are outdated.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PR · budget prompt · hard negative
“Was budget-friendly but shifted enterprise. Skip unless sales quotes a deal.” Grok 4.1 Fast · PR · budget prompt · hard negative
“auto-deletion after 12 months and unclear data sovereignty concerns” Perplexity Sonar · PR · negative prompt · soft negative
“MODERATE RISK ... Be very careful with contract terms.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Mention, over the 81 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Mention was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Brand2473 of 8121Not in the top three
Meltwater59 of 815Not in the top three
Cision56 of 813Not in the top three
Semrush AI PR Toolkit48 of 8110Not in the top three
Muck Rack44 of 814Not in the top three
Google Alerts38 of 812Not in the top three
Awario34 of 8115Not in the top three
Brandwatch24 of 810Not in the top three
Agility PR Solutions19 of 811Not in the top three
Talkwalker19 of 810Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Mention. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 81 answers that named Mention and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

prlab.co12
guideflow.com9
brand24.com7
g2.com7
gartner.com7
improvado.io7
shadow.inc7
truescope.com7
pr.co6
reachreport.io6

Seventy-five of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming Mention came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Mention

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Mention; a claim can dispute any of them.
Mention (mention.com) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Mention's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Mention, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at mention-me.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.