Every category where a model named CisionOne for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
PR and media monitoring	Marketing	0%	22 of 65	36%	11	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CisionOne yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CisionOne across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	2	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative10 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CisionOne | Global PR teams needing end-to-end workflow | 1.4M+ curated journalist contacts” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PR · comparative prompt · first choice

“CisionOne: Integrated PR workflow + monitoring, ~$10K/year” Mistral Small · PR · scale prompt · alternative

“Best for Comprehensive PR Workflows” Mistral Small · PR · direct prompt · alternative

“CisionOne is also worth a look” GPT-5.4 mini · PR · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“users have reported a severe decline in customer service... media database... riddled with "dead" contacts” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PR · negative prompt · hard negative

“financial distress signals (Moody's downgrade to Caa1, credit concerns), and it's a heavy, expensive enterprise tool” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PR · direct prompt · soft negative

“avoid enterprise giants (Cision/Meltwater) unless you have dedicated analysts” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PR · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“The legacy giant... though historically criticized for a clunkier interface.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PR · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CisionOne, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CisionOne was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Meltwater23 of 245Not in the top three

Muck Rack18 of 246Not in the top three

Brandwatch10 of 240Not in the top three

Brand249 of 244Not in the top three

Onclusive9 of 241Not in the top three

Semrush AI PR Toolkit9 of 241Not in the top three

Talkwalker8 of 240Not in the top three

Agility PR Solutions7 of 241Not in the top three

Cision7 of 240Not in the top three

Mention7 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CisionOne. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 24 answers that named CisionOne and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cision.comYour site5

meltwater.com5

g2.com2

muckrack.com2

onclusive.com2

agilitypr.com1

blog.hootsuite.com1

brandwatch.com1

delve.news1

guideflow.com1

Sixteen of the twenty-one domain citations in answers naming CisionOne came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cision.com/media-monitoring3

meltwater.com/en/capabilities/media-intelligence3

meltwater.com/en/products/media-monitoring3

cision.com/lp/cisionone-request-pricing2

meltwater.com/en/pricing2

meltwater.com/en/solutions/enterprise2

agilitypr.com/pr-news/agility-news-reports/best-media-monitoring-tools1

blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-monitoring-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CisionOne

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CisionOne; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cision / CisionOne 1Cision/CisionOne 1

The company

Cision is the company behind CisionOne.

Website: cision.com
Headquarters: Chicago, United States
Founded: 1867
Ownership: Public, CISN on New York Stock Exchange

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CisionOne's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CisionOne, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cision.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.