Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 31% → 33%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
33%from 31% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 1 of 66, unchanged
7 categories · RankedBrand24
181Judge labels
36First choices
16Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
32% in PR for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 47 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 40 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Brand24 →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 70
32%64 labels
endorsed leader
Mid-market3 of 47
11%40 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise4 of 47
4%12 labels
criticized challenger
In pr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Brand24 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR and media monitoring | Marketing | 11% | 3 of 47 | 5% | 40 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 14% → 10%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Brand protection platforms | Marketing | 6% | 6 of 84 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Red Points at 40% | |
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 4% | 8 of 90 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 2% | 18 of 92 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Competitive intelligence tools | Marketing | 0% | 24 of 86 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38% | |
| Audience and consumer insights platforms | Marketing | 0% | 100 of 155 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19% | |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 86 of 172 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Brand24 held within the floor in all seven categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PR · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 14% → 10%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 14% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 4 of 45, unchanged
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 6% → 4%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brand protection | 0% | 7% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 7% now. | New this edition | Rank 6 of 84, unchanged |
| AI visibility | 0% | 4% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 49 → 8 of 90 |
| PR | 14% | 10% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 14% → 10%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 47 |
| Reviews | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 32 → 18 of 92 |
| Competitive intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 24 of 86, unchanged |
| Audience insights | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 100 of 155, unchanged |
| Market intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 86 of 172, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Brand24 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Brand24 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels7
Paraphrase29 labels8
Comparative46 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained40 labels17
Scale-constrained14 labels4
Negative31 labels6not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative181 labels in all, every segment counted; 36 of the 50 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For a mid‑sized B2B company, Brand24 offers the best balance of comprehensive brand monitoring, AI visibility, and competitive insights” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI visibility · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Brand24 and Google Alerts are the most budget-friendly choices, with Brand24 offering more advanced features at a reasonable cost” Mistral Small · PR · budget prompt · first choice
“Best low-budget fit: Brand24 — the results describe it as suitable for teams that need straightforward brand monitoring” Perplexity Sonar · Brand protection · budget prompt · first choice
“best value option is usually Brand24 or Mention, with Brand24 often the stronger pick for pure media monitoring” GPT-5.4 mini · PR · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Pricing escalates quickly; reported issues with social listening accuracy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PR · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limitations: Less comprehensive than enterprise solutions” Kimi K2 · PR · comparative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Brand24, over the 181 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Brand24 was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Brand24, over the 181 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Brand24 was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Brand24. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 178 of the 181 answers that named Brand24 and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
brand24.comYour site102
g2.com80
meltwater.com74
guideflow.com68
shadow.inc58
onclusive.com55
pr.co51
learn.g2.com48
prlab.co46
thecmo.com46
526 of the 628 domain citations in answers naming Brand24 came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
brand24.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Brand24 takes 11% of first choices and Muck Rack takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
brand24.com ranks 5 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Brand24 takes 11% of first choices and Muck Rack takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “pr and media monitoring platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best pr and media monitoring platform”
5
- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,900 a month (“brand24”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 61 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 28,164 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,949 · 140 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 10,104
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
11%
rank 3 of 47 in PR
Segment leader
30%
Muck Rack
- First choices
- 36 across its categories
- Named in
- 181 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 178 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on brand24.com
3,139
subdomains included
Content
2,211
counted in the table below
Documentation
150
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,968 | 22 | 2026-09-29 | SEO, BI & dashboards | |
| Report or ebook | 88 | 2 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Case study | 80 | 0 | 2026-06-22 | ||
| Comparison | 39 | 0 | 2026-04-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 0 | 2026-06-08 | ||
| Podcast or video | 12 | 0 | 2025-11-20 | ||
| News or press | 6 | 0 | 2025-09-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2025-09-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2024-06-10 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Social listening tools blog
- 2026-09-16Separate your own content from the conversations you earn 346318 blog
- 2026-09-14Ai mentions 2 blog
- 2026-09-11AI Brand Mentions: How to Track and Increase Them [2026] | Brand24 blog
- 2026-09-09Discover more tiktok mentions with video transcriptions 345893 blog
- 2026-09-04The 12 Best AI Visibility Tools for 2026 (Tested & Reviewed) | Brand24 blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page brand24.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Brand24
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Brand24; a claim can dispute any of them.
Talkwalker / Brand24 1
Follow Brand24
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Brand24.ShowHide
The company
Brand24.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- brand24.com
- Headquarters
- Wrocław, Poland
- Founded
- 2011
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Brand24 is an AI-powered consumer intelligence and marketing platform that combines real-time media monitoring with social listening and sentiment analysis.
- For
- brands
- Price stated
- USD 199 to 1499 brand24.com
- Starting price
- 199 brand24.com
- Free plan or trial
- Sign up free brand24.com
- Integrations claimed
- 2 brand24.com/pricing.md
- Customers named
- SamsungUberCarlsbergMcCannStanford UniversityFuturamoPixel PRMobidoktor
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What Brand24's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: brand24.com, brand24.com/pricing.md, brand24.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Brand24's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Brand24, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Brand24 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Brand24 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Brand24, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Brand24 is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Brand24 is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideBrand24 is among the products AI models recommend first in PR and media monitoring this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.