GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Agility PR Solutions · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Agility PR Solutions

48Judge labels
6First choices
6Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in PR for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 65 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 11% of its 28 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In pr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Agility PR Solutions for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
PR and media monitoringMarketing12%5 of 6511%28accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Agility PR Solutions yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Agility PR Solutions across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash02013
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast03104
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash02114
Llama 4 Maverick10113
Qwen 3.7 Flash20002
Kimi K201203
GLM 4.7 FlashX10102
MiniMax M2.520103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels4
Paraphrase6 labels2
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend starting trials with Brand24 (best value) and Agility PR Solutions (best for AI-enhanced features)” MiniMax M2.5 · PR · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Agility PR Solutions ... widely regarded as the best mid-market-focused platform” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PR · direct prompt · first choice
“The best PR and media monitoring platform for a mid-market B2B company is Agility PR Solutions” Llama 4 Maverick · PR · direct prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Balance: Agility PR Solutions ... "sweet spot" for mid-market teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PR · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Agility utilizes a highly rigid annual contract with a 90-day auto-renewal notice requirement” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PR · negative prompt · hard negative
“but they are more expensive and may be more suitable for larger companies” Llama 4 Maverick · PR · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“MODERATE CAUTION” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Agility PR Solutions, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agility PR Solutions was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Meltwater48 of 488Not in the top three
Muck Rack42 of 488Not in the top three
Cision36 of 482Not in the top three
Semrush AI PR Toolkit28 of 485Not in the top three
Brand2427 of 486Not in the top three
Brandwatch21 of 480Not in the top three
Mention19 of 483Not in the top three
Onclusive18 of 482Not in the top three
Talkwalker11 of 480Not in the top three
Google Alerts8 of 481Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agility PR Solutions. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 48 answers that named Agility PR Solutions and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

agilitypr.comYour site4
prlab.co4
brand24.com3
gartner.com3
guideflow.com3
improvado.io3
learn.g2.com3
onclusive.com3
pr.co3
prowly.com3

Twenty-eight of the thirty-two domain citations in answers naming Agility PR Solutions came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Agility PR Solutions

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Agility PR Solutions; a claim can dispute any of them.
Agility PR 4
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agility PR Solutions's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agility PR Solutions, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at agilitypr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack