AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Onclusive · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Onclusive

42Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in PR for enterprise buyers
Rank 13 of 47 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Onclusive →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In pr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Onclusive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
PR and media monitoringMarketing0%13 of 4710%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing0%121 of 1550%1under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%

Movement

Since September 2026, Onclusive held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · PR · by segment

Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 23 → 55 of 66
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 13 of 45
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 8 → 12 of 45

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
PR0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 12 → 13 of 47
Audience insights0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 121 of 155, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Onclusive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash02002
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative14 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained10 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Onclusive|PR Attribution™ linking media visibility to business outcomes|Measuring PR effectiveness|” Muse Glimmer 30B · PR · comparative prompt · alternative
“Onclusive: Enterprise-grade measurement and PR campaign management” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PR · scale prompt · alternative
“Good alternative if you want a dedicated media intelligence platform.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PR · direct prompt · alternative
“For unified measurement & ROI focus: Onclusive.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · PR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Its unified platform is relatively new: Onclusive announced its launch on September 1, 2026.” GPT-6 Luna · PR · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Onclusive, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Onclusive was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Meltwater41 of 4217Not among the top eight
CisionOne40 of 4210Not among the top eight
Brandwatch33 of 420Not among the top eight
Muck Rack28 of 425Not among the top eight
Talkwalker20 of 420Not among the top eight
Brand2413 of 421Not among the top eight
Semrush AI PR Toolkit9 of 421Not among the top eight
Agility PR Solutions8 of 421Not among the top eight
Mention7 of 421Not among the top eight
Sprinklr7 of 420Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Onclusive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 42 answers that named Onclusive and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

meltwater.com33
onclusive.comYour site33
pr.co24
learn.g2.com21
guideflow.com20
g2.com19
shadow.inc19
therankmasters.com15
brand24.com14
gartner.com13

178 of the 211 domain citations in answers naming Onclusive came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

onclusive.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Onclusive takes 0% of first choices and Muck Rack takes 30%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “pr and media monitoring platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best pr and media monitoring platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“onclusive”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 14,604 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,404 · 139 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,022
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
12 ads · 12 text · 8 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2025, as PRECISE MEDIA MONITORING LTD, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 8 in the year, 4 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 13 of 47 in PR
Segment leader
30%
Muck Rack
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
42 answers
Its own site cited
in 41 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on onclusive.com
2,120
subdomains included
Content
901
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
15 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog559302026-09-23
Report or ebook15012026-09-28
Webinar or virtual event7932026-08-28
Case study5802023-12-05
Glossary or explainer1802026-06-18
News or press1432026-07-22
Conference or event1102026-06-18
Comparison942026-09-07
Template or tool2undated
Podcast or video102016-05-03

Events in person

Upcoming
Last twelve months

As the event pages on onclusive.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page onclusive.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Onclusive

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Onclusive is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Media Intelligence for PR, Communications and Marketing Professionals
For
PR, Communications and Marketing professionals
Certifications
CCPACyber Essentials PlusEcoVadis OCT 2025 - CommittedGDPRISO/IEC 27001PDPASOC 2 Type 2Standard Contractual Clause (SCC)
Customers named
MullenLowe U.SSiemensCarrefour ItalySMGSave the Children International (Asia)EdmundsAirbnbSNCF
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Onclusive's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: onclusive.com, trust.onclusive.com, onclusive.com/products/analytics. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Onclusive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Onclusive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Onclusive by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Onclusive is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Onclusive, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at onclusive.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.