AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Awario · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Awario

66Judge labels
21First choices
4Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in PR for small business buyers
Rank 7 of 47 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 12 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Awario →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In pr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Awario for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
PR and media monitoringMarketing9%7 of 478%12accepted challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing7%6 of 1550%5under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%
Market intelligence platformsGTM data and infrastructure2%18 of 1720%4under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17%

Movement

Since September 2026, Awario held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · PR · by segment

Small business▼−9Since September 2026: 20% → 12%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 20% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 3 → 4 of 66
Mid-market▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 45
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 34 → 39 of 45

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Audience insights0%9%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 9% now.New this editionRank 6 of 155, unchanged
PR16%10%▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 3 → 7 of 47
Market intelligence0%2%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.New this editionRank 18 of 172, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Awario across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500011
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.2010102
Mistral Small30003
DeepSeek V4 Flash12003
Llama 4 Maverick10203
Qwen 3.7 Flash20002
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative12 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained37 labels20
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 27 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best audience insights platform for a company with a limited budget is Awario, which starts at $29 per month.” Llama 4 Maverick · Audience insights · budget prompt · first choice
“Best Overall Value (Monitoring & Insights): Awario ... often considered the best budget-friendly option.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · PR · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Social Monitoring & Competitors: Awario ... provides the most features for the lowest price” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Audience insights · budget prompt · first choice
“If you just want to track where you are mentioned for the lowest cost: Go with Awario (~$29/mo)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PR · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“analytics are shallow and coverage has gaps on some platforms, which is the trade you make at this price” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PR · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Awario, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Awario was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
CisionOne28 of 662Not among the top eight
Brandwatch15 of 660Not among the top eight
Semrush12 of 660Not among the top eight
SparkToro11 of 664Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Awario. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 66 answers that named Awario and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brand24.com31
guideflow.com29
g2.com28
meltwater.com24
onclusive.com20
shadow.inc20
dashsocial.com19
geekflare.com17
learn.g2.com16
newsdata.io16

220 of the 220 domain citations in answers naming Awario came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

awario.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Awario takes 9% of first choices and Muck Rack takes 30%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “pr and media monitoring platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best pr and media monitoring platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“awario”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
11 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 37,633 a month
Searches its site ranks for
5,553 · 76 in the top three
Sites linking to it
4,507
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
9%
rank 7 of 47 in PR
Segment leader
30%
Muck Rack
First choices
21 across its categories
Named in
66 answers
Its own site cited
in 66 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on awario.com
1,730
subdomains included
Content
585
counted in the table below
Documentation
518
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog48902026-04-21SEO, Social media
Report or ebook3302019-07-08
Case study1902017-07-12
Comparison1602026-01-24
Glossary or explainer12undated
Webinar or virtual event6undatedDirect mail
News or press4undated
Conference or event3undated
Podcast or video2undated
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page awario.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Awario

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Awario.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
awario.com
Founded
2016

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Brand monitoring tool to analyze all brand mentions on the web
For
businesses
Price stated
Starter $49/mo billed annually; $29/mo billed monthly. Pro $149/mo billed annually; $89/mo billed monthly. Enterprise $399/mo billed annually; $249/mo billed monthly. Custom solution available. awario.com/pricing
Starting price
29/mo awario.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Start brand monitoring for free! awario.com
Customers named
Sulit.phDesign & DevelopContent AmplifiedUpJourneyGeekwise AcademyRingBoostSeraphVolterra
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations, certifications, hosting

What Awario's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: awario.com, awario.com/pricing, awario.com/features, awario.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Awario's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Awario, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Awario by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Awario is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Awario, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at awario.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.