Every category where a model named Awario for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
PR and media monitoring	Marketing	16%	3 of 65	7%	14	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Awario yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Awario across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labels1

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative7 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained20 labels15

Scale-constrained4 labels1

Negative10 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 22 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Awario is the cheapest fully-featured listening tool on the market. ... Choose Awario if you have a micro-budget and want the most robust ... listening tool possible.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PR · budget prompt · first choice

“The best PR and media monitoring platform for a company with a limited budget is Awario, which starts at $29/month” Llama 4 Maverick · PR · budget prompt · first choice

“Frequently recommended as best value for small businesses... then upgrade to Awario ($29/mo)” MiniMax M2.5 · PR · budget prompt · first choice

“Awario offers the best value-for-money at $24-29/month for most small businesses” Mistral Small · PR · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Lowest rated among common monitoring tools (3.9/5 on G2)” MiniMax M2.5 · PR · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Awario, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Awario was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Brand2448 of 4815Not in the top three

Semrush AI PR Toolkit37 of 486Compare →

Mention34 of 482Not in the top three

Google Alerts34 of 481Not in the top three

Cision29 of 482Not in the top three

Meltwater29 of 482Not in the top three

Muck Rack22 of 481Compare →

Brandwatch14 of 480Not in the top three

Hootsuite11 of 480Not in the top three

Sprout Social10 of 480Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Awario. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 48 answers that named Awario and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloro.dev2

g2.com2

guideflow.com2

prlab.co2

thecmo.com2

brand24.com1

ereleases.com1

gartner.com1

improvado.io1

meltwater.com1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming Awario came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloro.dev/blog/media-monitoring-tools2

prlab.co/blog/the-best-media-monitoring-tools-for-news-and-social-media2

thecmo.com/tools/best-media-monitoring-software2

brand24.com/blog/media-monitoring-tools1

ereleases.com/best-media-monitoring-tools-small-businesses-complete-guide1

g2.com/categories/media-monitoring1

g2.com/discussions/best-media-monitoring-tool-for-small-business1

gartner.com/reviews/market/pr-and-media-monitoring-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Awario.

Website: awario.com
Founded: 2016

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Awario's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Awario, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at awario.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.