GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Podium · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Podium

114Judge labels
0First choices
55Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Reviews for mid-market buyers
Rank 26 of 103 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 32% of its 41 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Podium for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Review and reputation managementMarketing0%26 of 10332%41criticized challenger
Customer success platformsCustomer0%49 of 690%1under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 39%
Mobile marketing and pushMarketing0%71 of 75100%1under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Podium yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Podium across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501012
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01124
Perplexity Sonar03003
Grok 4.1 Fast01225
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash02136
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash10225
Kimi K201247
GLM 4.7 FlashX02103
MiniMax M2.502103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labelsNone
Paraphrase16 labelsNone
Comparative29 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labelsNone
Negative32 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative114 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Are you a dentist/auto dealer wanting to chat via text? → Choose Podium.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Reviews · comparative prompt · first choice
“Other options to consider are ReviewGrower and Podium, which offer various features and pricing plans.” Llama 4 Maverick · Reviews · budget prompt · alternative
“Reputable platforms: Birdeye, Podium, ReviewTrackers, NiceJob, GatherUp, BrightLocal” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Reviews · negative prompt · alternative
“Choose Podium if your review strategy depends on SMS and fast customer replies.” Perplexity Sonar · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“1. Podium ⚠️ Significant Red Flags - Contract Traps: Annual contracts with auto-renewals and difficult cancellation policies” Kimi K2 · Mobile & push · negative prompt · hard negative
“High BBB complaint volumes (Podium: D- rating, 200+ in 3 years) ... billing disputes, hard cancellations” Grok 4.1 Fast · Reviews · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if budget is tight: Podium, Birdeye, Weave, and Reputation.com” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · budget prompt · hard negative
“Podium ($249+/month) are excellent but overkill for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · Reviews · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Podium, over the 114 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Podium was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Birdeye99 of 11427Not in the top three
Reputation58 of 1149Not in the top three
NiceJob53 of 11421Not in the top three
ReviewTrackers37 of 1146Not in the top three
BrightLocal31 of 1143Not in the top three
Trustpilot30 of 1140Not in the top three
GatherUp25 of 1141Not in the top three
ReviewGrower24 of 1147Not in the top three
Yext24 of 1140Not in the top three
Reviewflowz22 of 1147Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Podium. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 114 answers that named Podium and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

appfollow.io10
birdeye.com10
usa.inquirer.net10
g2.com8
learn.g2.com6
almcorp.com5
gartner.com5
ranked.solutions5
thecmo.com5
alchemer.com4

Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Podium came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Podium.
Website
podium.com
Headquarters
Lehi, United States
Founded
2013

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Podium's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Podium, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at podium.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.