| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 0% | 26 of 103 | 32% | 41 | criticized challenger |
| Customer success platforms | Customer | 0% | 49 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChurnZero at 39% |
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 0% | 71 of 75 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Are you a dentist/auto dealer wanting to chat via text? → Choose Podium.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Reviews · comparative prompt · first choice
“Other options to consider are ReviewGrower and Podium, which offer various features and pricing plans.” Llama 4 Maverick · Reviews · budget prompt · alternative
“Reputable platforms: Birdeye, Podium, ReviewTrackers, NiceJob, GatherUp, BrightLocal” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Reviews · negative prompt · alternative
“Choose Podium if your review strategy depends on SMS and fast customer replies.” Perplexity Sonar · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“1. Podium ⚠️ Significant Red Flags - Contract Traps: Annual contracts with auto-renewals and difficult cancellation policies” Kimi K2 · Mobile & push · negative prompt · hard negative
“High BBB complaint volumes (Podium: D- rating, 200+ in 3 years) ... billing disputes, hard cancellations” Grok 4.1 Fast · Reviews · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if budget is tight: Podium, Birdeye, Weave, and Reputation.com” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Reviews · budget prompt · hard negative
“Podium ($249+/month) are excellent but overkill for limited budgets” Kimi K2 · Reviews · budget prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 114 answers that named Podium and are not a share of its labels.
Sixty-eight of the sixty-eight domain citations in answers naming Podium came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Podium's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Podium, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at podium.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.