Small business▼−3Since September 2026: 18% → 15%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 18% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 1 of 90, unchanged
1 category · RankedNiceJob
63Judge labels
10First choices
3Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Reviews for small business buyers
Rank 16 of 92 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business1 of 97
15%44 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market16 of 92
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise84 of 88
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named NiceJob for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 2% | 16 of 92 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, NiceJob held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Reviews · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 9 → 15 of 86
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 88 → 80 of 84
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reviews | 2% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 16 of 92 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated NiceJob across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated NiceJob across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels6
Paraphrase10 labelsNone
Comparative17 labels9not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained6 labels2
Negative8 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative63 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“NiceJob offers the best balance of automation, features, and price specifically for small businesses” Kimi K2 · Reviews · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose NiceJob if you want simple, automated review generation and social proof for a service business.” Perplexity Sonar · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
“look for competitors that offer transparent, month-to-month pricing (such as NiceJob, GradeUs, or Broadly)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Reviews · negative prompt · alternative
“Best for: SMBs looking for a simple, automated, and affordable review funnel.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NiceJob, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NiceJob was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as NiceJob, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and NiceJob was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named NiceJob. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 63 answers that named NiceJob and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
usa.inquirer.net38
learn.g2.com31
g2.com29
birdeye.com26
appfollow.io24
thecmo.com22
zapier.com22
guideflow.com21
capterra.com19
viasocket.com18
250 of the 250 domain citations in answers naming NiceJob came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
nicejob.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, NiceJob takes 2% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
nicejob.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, NiceJob takes 2% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“nicejob”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 18 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,328 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 8,102 · 81 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,560
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 16 of 92 in reviews
Segment leader
18%
Birdeye
- First choices
- 10 across its categories
- Named in
- 63 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 63 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on nicejob.com
447
subdomains included
Content
302
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
13 · 46
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 280 | 1 | 2026-09-02 | SEO | |
| Comparison | 9 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 3 | undated | SEO | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | SEO | ||
| Case study | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-02Book a discovery call sites blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page nicejob.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (16); 0 name the category the models place it in. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow NiceJob
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
NiceJob is its own company.ShowHide
The company
NiceJob is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The #1 AI-Powered Reputation Marketing Software
- For
- service businesses
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial nicejob.com
- Integrations claimed
- 9000 nicejob.com
- Customers named
- Miller’s Tree Service
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, certifications, hosting
What NiceJob's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: nicejob.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when NiceJob's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as NiceJob, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for NiceJob by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where NiceJob is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name NiceJob, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.