AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Trustpilot · October 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Trustpilot

56Judge labels
3First choices
11Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Reviews for small business buyers
Rank 32 of 92 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 21% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Trustpilot →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Trustpilot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Review and reputation managementMarketing0%32 of 9221%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Competitive intelligence toolsMarketing0%52 of 860%1under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38%
Customer feedback and surveysCustomer0%66 of 840%1under 10 labels · led by CustomerGauge at 24%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Loyalty, advocacy and referralsMarketing0%90 of 1100%1under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 26%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

Since September 2026, Trustpilot held within the floor in all four categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · Reviews · by segment

Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 33 → 11 of 90
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 21 → 30 of 86
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 83 → 8 of 84

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Reviews0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 21 → 32 of 92
Competitive intel0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 52 of 86, unchanged
Feedback0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 96 → 66 of 84
Loyalty0%0%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 48 → 90 of 110

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Trustpilot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash03003
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2002002
Mistral Small00112
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00011
Muse Glimmer 30B01113

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels1
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative13 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained9 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative56 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For Customer Pain Points & Switching Intent: G2, Capterra, or Trustpilot” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Competitive intel · budget prompt · alternative
“Choose Trustpilot if your goal is public trust and conversion proof.” GPT-5.4 mini · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for: E-commerce, SaaS, and online-only service businesses.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Reviews · comparative prompt · alternative
“Trustpilot (Public Trust Option): Highly trusted by B2B buyers.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Reviews · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“creates well-documented incentives for review bias and for disputes over how reviews are displayed... concerns about transparency and fairness around review removal” Muse Glimmer 30B · Reviews · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with Trustpilot due to potential issues with unverified reviews and business practices.” Mistral Small · Reviews · negative prompt · soft negative
“It's not primarily an inbox for managing reviews across local sites.” GPT-6 Luna · Reviews · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trustpilot, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trustpilot was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Birdeye39 of 568Not among the top eight
Podium27 of 560Not among the top eight
Reputation23 of 563Not among the top eight
ReviewTrackers18 of 561Not among the top eight
G2 Buyer Intent16 of 563Not among the top eight
Yext13 of 560Not among the top eight
BrightLocal10 of 561Not among the top eight
Capterra10 of 560Not among the top eight
NiceJob8 of 563Not among the top eight
TrustRadius8 of 560Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trustpilot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 56 answers that named Trustpilot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com26
birdeye.com21
learn.g2.com18
usa.inquirer.net16
thecmo.com15
appfollow.io14
wiserreview.com14
zapier.com13
surveysparrow.com12
swydo.com11

160 of the 160 domain citations in answers naming Trustpilot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

trustpilot.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trustpilot takes 0% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
165,000 a month (“trustpilot”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2,892 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 88,097,858 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,666,707 · 330,785 in the top three
Sites linking to it
426,661
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
35+ ads · 35 text · 35 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2025, as LegitGrails OÜ, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 32 in the year, 3 before. 85 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 32 of 92 in reviews
Segment leader
18%
Birdeye
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
56 answers
Its own site cited
in 50 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on trustpilot.com
47,743
subdomains included
Content
163
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
1 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
News or press71undated
Conference or event31undated
Report or ebook30undated
Comparison22undated
Template or tool4undated
Webinar or virtual event2undated
Glossary or explainer2undated
Blog1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page trustpilot.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Trustpilot

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trustpilot; a claim can dispute any of them.
Trustpilot Business 1

Follow Trustpilot

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Trustpilot.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Headquarters
Copenhagen, Denmark
Founded
2007

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
We're all about consumer reviews. Get the real inside story from shoppers like you. Read, write and share reviews on Trustpilot today.
For
shoppers like you
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2
Customers named
Platformly
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What Trustpilot's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: trustpilot.com, trustpilot.com/review/planse.co.uk, trust.trustpilot.com, trustpilot.com/review/platform.ly. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trustpilot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trustpilot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trustpilot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Trustpilot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trustpilot, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trustpilot.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.