Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 21 of 90
7 categories · RankedG2 Buyer Intent
177Judge labels
15First choices
13Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
7Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Intent data for enterprise buyers
Rank 4 of 92 in the mid-market standing
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of G2 Buyer Intent →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 97
2%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 92
5%9 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 88
11%9 labels
under the label threshold
In reviews · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named G2 Buyer Intent for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Review and reputation management | Marketing | 5% | 4 of 92 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 18% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 2% | 9 of 60 | 11% | 44 | accepted challenger | ▼−11Since September 2026: 13% → 2%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 133 of 172 | 50% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% | |
| Competitive intelligence tools | Marketing | 0% | 21 of 86 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Kompyte at 38% | |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 52 of 71 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 62 of 135 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Video advertising | Marketing | 0% | 60 of 114 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 32% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, G2 Buyer Intent moved past the floor in one of seven categories: Intent data, −11 points to 2%. It held within the floor in the other six.
Best category · Reviews · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 6 of 86
Enterprise▲+6Since September 2026: 4% → 10%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 6 → 3 of 84
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intent data | 13% | 2% | ▼−11Since September 2026: 13% → 2%, −11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 3 → 9 of 60 |
| Reviews | 2% | 4% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 4 of 92 |
| Market intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 133 of 172, unchanged |
| Competitive intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 21 of 86, unchanged |
| ABM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 52 of 71, unchanged |
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 62 of 135, unchanged |
| Video ads | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 60 of 114, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated G2 Buyer Intent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated G2 Buyer Intent across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct51 labels11
Paraphrase28 labels1
Comparative39 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels2
Scale-constrained21 labels1
Negative26 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative177 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“G2 is non-negotiable in 2026, with AI models citing G2 grids more than any other B2B review source” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Reviews · direct prompt · first choice
“the best choice is usually G2 if your priority is B2B buyer trust and review generation” GPT-5.4 mini · Reviews · direct prompt · first choice
“Bombora layered with G2 Buyer Intent is the pragmatic starting point.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Intent data · direct prompt · first choice
“my default pick is G2's vendor platform” GPT-6 Luna · Reviews · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“But check the actual package and price first: G2 says signal access depends on your plan, and its public pricing doesn't clearly show Buyer Intent as included in the low-cost Starter plan.” GPT-6 Luna · Intent data · budget prompt · soft negative
“G2/TrustRadius/TechTarget-style intent can be useful, but it is often best for product-category research and may be less useful if you need broad, person-level buying intent” GPT-5.4 mini · Intent data · negative prompt · soft negative
“Each appears in comparison charts but shares recurring pain points—stale data, opaque predictive models, steep learning curves” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Intent data · negative prompt · soft negative
“G2 acquired the other three in early 2026, so don't count their rankings or reviews as four independent votes.” GPT-6 Luna · Market intelligence · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as G2 Buyer Intent, over the 177 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and G2 Buyer Intent was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as G2 Buyer Intent, over the 177 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and G2 Buyer Intent was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named G2 Buyer Intent. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 163 of the 177 answers that named G2 Buyer Intent and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
demandbase.com86
pipeline.zoominfo.com54
percepture.com46
g2.comYour site45
rb2b.com45
zenabm.com35
salesmotion.io34
hginsights.com30
autobound.ai28
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com27
385 of the 430 domain citations in answers naming G2 Buyer Intent came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
g2.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, G2 Buyer Intent takes 5% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.ShowHide
Search and answers
g2.com ranks 9 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, G2 Buyer Intent takes 5% of first choices and Birdeye takes 18%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “online review management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best online review management platform”
9
- Searches for its name, Google
- 90 a month (“g2 buyer intent”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 1 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,221,182 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 361,975 · 6,728 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 78,310
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
5%
rank 4 of 92 in reviews
Segment leader
18%
Birdeye
- First choices
- 15 across its categories
- Named in
- 177 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 163 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on g2.com
10,005
subdomains included
Content
3,166
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
4,770 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,152 | 40 | 2026-09-25 | SEO, CRM | |
| News or press | 281 | 13 | 2026-09-25 | CRM, SEO | |
| Report or ebook | 275 | 0 | 2026-06-05 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 112 | 1 | 2026-07-07 | ABM | |
| Comparison | 104 | 2 | 2026-09-02 | SEO, DAM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 87 | 0 | 2025-07-18 | CPQ, SEO | |
| Case study | 85 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | SEO | |
| Podcast or video | 32 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Conference or event | 26 | 0 | 2025-10-01 | ||
| Template or tool | 12 | 0 | 2024-01-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Tech signals how to pick sales software 2026 blog
- 2026-09-25Newsletter news or press
- 2026-09-24How pandadoc grows influenced pipeline with g2 case study
- 2026-09-22G2 accelerates gtm execution buyer intent customer proof solutions news or press
- 2026-09-16Professional spotlight christopher cox blog
- 2026-09-16Dreamforce 2026 keynote recap blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page g2.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (20); 6 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as G2 Buyer Intent
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as G2 Buyer Intent; a claim can dispute any of them.
G2 41G2 (Buyer Intent) 1G2 / TrustRadius 1
Follow G2 Buyer Intent
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
G2 is the company behind G2 Buyer Intent.ShowHide
The company
G2 is the company behind G2 Buyer Intent.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- g2.com
- Headquarters
- Chicago, United States
- Founded
- 2012
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type 2SOC 3Privacy Shield VerifiedGDPRCCPACPRACSA STAR
- Not stated on the pages read
- Positioning, who it is for, price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers
What G2 Buyer Intent's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: g2.com, trust.g2.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when G2 Buyer Intent's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as G2 Buyer Intent, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for G2 Buyer Intent by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where G2 Buyer Intent is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name G2 Buyer Intent, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.