Small business▼−9Since September 2026: 13% → 4%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 2 pointsRank 2 of 63, unchanged
10 categories · RankedDealfront
178Judge labels
28First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
10Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in Web analytics for small business buyers
Rank 3 of 60 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 37 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Dealfront →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business2 of 68
5%46 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market3 of 60
12%37 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise13 of 46
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In intent data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Dealfront for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 12% | 3 of 60 | 0% | 37 | accepted challenger | ▲+11Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Web analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 7% | 4 of 91 | 0% | 12 | accepted challenger | |
| Session replay and heatmaps | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 14 of 56 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33% | |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 21 of 71 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Identity resolution | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 39 of 140 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Audience and consumer insights platforms | Marketing | 0% | 55 of 155 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19% | |
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 21 of 52 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Field sales tools | Sales | 0% | 36 of 94 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Badger Maps at 38% | |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 94 of 111 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 77 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Dealfront held within the floor in all ten categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Intent data · by segment
Mid-market▲+11Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 0 pointsRank 7 → 3 of 58
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 13 of 44
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intent data | 2% | 12% | ▲+11Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 3 of 60 |
| Web analytics | 0% | 6% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 6% now. | New this edition | Rank 4 of 91, unchanged |
| Session replay | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 14 of 56, unchanged |
| ABM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 59 → 21 of 71 |
| Identity | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 42 → 39 of 140 |
| Audience insights | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 55 of 155, unchanged |
| Sales intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 31 → 21 of 52 |
| Field sales | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 36 of 94, unchanged |
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 76 → 94 of 111 |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 77 of 116, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Dealfront across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Dealfront across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct37 labels7
Paraphrase50 labels17
Comparative23 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained38 labels3
Scale-constrained13 labels1
Negative17 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative178 labels in all, every segment counted; 28 of the 34 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For a mid-sized B2B company, Dealfront offers the best balance of intent visibility, mid-market focus, and affordability.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Intent data · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“My top pick for most mid-sized B2B companies: Start with GA4 (free) + Leadfeeder (affordable at $99/month)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Web analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“combine Apollo.io (to find the right accounts) with Leadfeeder (to verify interest)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Intent data · budget prompt · first choice
“Leadfeeder is usually the best fit for a B2B team that cares about sales opportunities” Perplexity Sonar · Web analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“several review pages mention slow, dismissive, or nonexistent support for tools like LeadConnect and Leadfeeder” GPT-5.4 mini · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative
“IP recognition often misidentifies visitors, categorizing unrelated industries as potential leads” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ABM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Dealfront, over the 171 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dealfront was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Dealfront, over the 171 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Dealfront was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dealfront. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 164 of the 171 answers that named Dealfront and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com80
demandbase.com74
rb2b.com68
factors.ai42
g2.com41
saleshandy.com39
percepture.com38
prospeo.io38
zenabm.com37
leadfeeder.comYour site36
457 of the 493 domain citations in answers naming Dealfront came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
leadfeeder.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Dealfront takes 12% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
leadfeeder.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Dealfront takes 12% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“dealfront”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 9 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 18,447 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 4,969 · 179 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 8,293
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
12%
rank 3 of 60 in intent data
Segment leader
27%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 28 across its categories
- Named in
- 171 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 164 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on leadfeeder.com
2,037
subdomains included
Content
899
counted in the table below
Documentation
350
Product · Integration
17 · 16
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 679 | undated | ABM, SEO | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 57 | undated | CRM | ||
| Case study | 45 | undated | ABM | ||
| Report or ebook | 40 | undated | ABM, SEO | ||
| Comparison | 40 | 0 | 2026-03-18 | ||
| News or press | 22 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | ABM | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-03-1813921756 basic feeds vs custom feeds comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page leadfeeder.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Dealfront
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Dealfront; a claim can dispute any of them.
Leadfeeder 32Dealfront (formerly Leadfeeder) 6Leadfeeder (Dealfront) 4Dealfront (Leadfeeder) 2Dealfront (ex-Leadfeeder) 2Dealfront/Leadfeeder 2Leadfeeder (now Dealfront) 2Leadfeeder/Dealfront 2Leadfeeder (by Dealfront) 1Leadfeeder/Lead Seeker 1RB2B/Leadfeeder 1
Follow Dealfront
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Dealfront is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Dealfront is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Turn Your Website Into a Lead Generation Engine
- For
- marketing and sales teams
- Price stated
- Lite $0; Discover starting at $79 per month, billed annually; Activate starting at $369 per month, billed annually; Scale starting at $599 per month, billed annually; Enterprise Custom leadfeeder.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 0 leadfeeder.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial. No credit card required. leadfeeder.com
- Integrations claimed
- 4 leadfeeder.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPR compliantGDPR & ComplianceISO 27001ISO 27701
- Hosting
- EUEU/EEA area
- Customers named
- CustobarDNAAutomatiKingSnuupSchneider ElectricZendevCoverisReachdesk
What Dealfront's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: leadfeeder.com, leadfeeder.com/pricing, leadfeeder.com/security, leadfeeder.com/solutions/sales, leadfeeder.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Dealfront's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Dealfront, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Dealfront by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Dealfront is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Dealfront, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Dealfront is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Dealfront is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideDealfront is among the products AI models recommend first in B2B intent data providers this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.