Small business▲+6Since September 2026: 25% → 31%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
31%from 25% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 5 pointsRank 2 of 42, unchanged
HubSpot · 28 categories · RankedHubSpot Marketing Hub
988Judge labels
253First choices
161Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
28Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
63% in Marketing automation for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 59 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
13 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 73 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of HubSpot Marketing Hub →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business2 of 44
31%69 labels
criticized default
Mid-market1 of 59
63%73 labels
endorsed leader
Enterprise2 of 54
18%68 labels
criticized challenger
In marketing automation · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named HubSpot Marketing Hub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 63% | 1 of 59 | 15% | 73 | endorsed leader | ▲+4Since September 2026: 57% → 61%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 38% | 1 of 115 | 5% | 39 | endorsed leader | ▼−2Since September 2026: 36% → 34%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 35% | 1 of 66 | 8% | 52 | endorsed leader | ▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 9% | 3 of 135 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 9% → 11%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 8% | 3 of 71 | 5% | 38 | accepted challenger | ▼−7Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 7% | 4 of 124 | 20% | 20 | accepted challenger | ▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer intelligence and data science | GTM data and infrastructure | 6% | 8 of 142 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Amplitude at 18% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational marketing platforms | Marketing | 6% | 6 of 87 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger | |
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 5% | 7 of 113 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 13% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI marketing agents | Marketing | 4% | 7 of 157 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Breeze at 24% | |
| Audience and consumer insights platforms | Marketing | 4% | 8 of 155 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19% | |
| Marketing resource management | Marketing | 4% | 8 of 110 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24% | |
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 3% | 11 of 117 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Web analytics | GTM data and infrastructure | 3% | 6 of 91 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger | |
| Data management platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 7 of 159 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 37% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 2% | 16 of 130 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Foursquare Proximity at 15% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Creative automation platforms | Marketing | 2% | 13 of 109 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Bannerflow at 19% | |
| Market intelligence platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 28 of 172 | 43% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 17% | |
| Attribution and marketing mix modeling | Marketing | 2% | 11 of 123 | 16% | 19 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 1% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 2% | 13 of 69 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 30% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Social media management | Marketing | 0% | 13 of 53 | 14% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SMS and WhatsApp marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 27 of 111 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | |
| SEO and content optimization platforms | Marketing | 0% | 23 of 78 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Semrush at 21% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI visibility and answer engine tracking tools | Marketing | 0% | 53 of 90 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Otterly at 20% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Lead routing and management | Sales | 0% | 39 of 111 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 0% | 40 of 80 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Session replay and heatmaps | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 41 of 56 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33% | |
| Workflow automation and iPaaS | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 33 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Workato at 28% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, HubSpot Marketing Hub held within the floor in all twenty-eight categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Marketing automation · by segment
Mid-market▲+4Since September 2026: 57% → 61%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
61%from 57% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 1 of 51, unchanged
Enterprise▲+5Since September 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
20%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 6 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 50
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABM | 11% | 4% | ▼−7Since September 2026: 11% → 4%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 3 of 71 |
| Conversational mktg | 0% | 6% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 6% now. | New this edition | Rank 6 of 87, unchanged |
| Channel marketing | 2% | 8% | ▲+6Since September 2026: 2% → 8%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 4 of 124 |
| Email marketing | 27% | 32% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 1 of 66 |
| Marketing resource mgt | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 8 of 110, unchanged |
| Marketing automation | 57% | 61% | ▲+4Since September 2026: 57% → 61%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 59, unchanged |
| Web analytics | 0% | 4% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now. | New this edition | Rank 6 of 91, unchanged |
| Customer intel | 10% | 7% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 10% → 7%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 → 8 of 142 |
| Proximity | 0% | 3% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 0% → 3%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 55 → 16 of 130 |
| AI marketing agents | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 7 of 157, unchanged |
| Audience insights | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 8 of 155, unchanged |
| Creative automation | 0% | 2% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now. | New this edition | Rank 13 of 109, unchanged |
| SEO | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 23 of 78 |
| Ecommerce marketing | 36% | 34% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 36% → 34%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 1 of 115, unchanged |
| Landing pages | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 13 of 69 |
| Content marketing | 9% | 11% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 9% → 11%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 3 of 135 |
| Paid ads | 5% | 6% | ▲+1Since September 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 8 → 7 of 113 |
| DMP | 4% | 3% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 3%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 7 of 159 |
| Attribution & MMM | 1% | 2% | =heldSince September 2026: 1% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 11 of 123 |
| Mobile apps | 4% | 4% | =heldSince September 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 9 → 11 of 117 |
| Market intelligence | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 28 of 172, unchanged |
| Social media | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 29 → 13 of 53 |
| SMS & WhatsApp | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 27 of 111, unchanged |
| AI visibility | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 53 of 90, unchanged |
| Lead routing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 39 of 111, unchanged |
| Mobile & push | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 40 of 80, unchanged |
| Session replay | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 56, unchanged |
| Automation & iPaaS | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 67, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated HubSpot Marketing Hub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated HubSpot Marketing Hub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 11 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 28 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 20 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 7 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 23 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 18 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 31 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 11 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 30 |
| Mistral Small | 6 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 22 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 8 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 23 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 15 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 7 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 26 |
| Kimi K2 | 11 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 29 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 7 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 26 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 6 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 29 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 8 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 19 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 13 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 24 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct259 labels112
Paraphrase212 labels94
Comparative171 labels37not counted in share
Budget-constrained137 labels33
Scale-constrained80 labels14
Negative129 labels13not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative988 labels in all, every segment counted; 253 of the 303 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you're a B2B company with a complex sales cycle, HubSpot remains the most complete option — with caveats. ... Best for B2B Winner: HubSpot with significant cost caveats.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Email marketing · direct prompt · first choice
“HubSpot Marketing Hub is a common small-business pick because it centralizes marketing data and is highlighted by G2 as a leading small-business attribution option” GPT-5.4 mini · Attribution & MMM · budget prompt · first choice
“1. HubSpot Marketing Hub - Best for: Mid-market companies and enterprises... Strong integration with other HubSpot tools and a user-friendly interface” Mistral Small · Marketing automation · comparative prompt · first choice
“HubSpot Marketing Hub Professional — tight CRM integration, 4–6 week deployment, transparent pricing. The default for mid-market B2B.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Marketing automation · scale prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Recommending HubSpot to small businesses is irresponsible, and for everyone except B2B companies doing £1M+ in revenue, it's a trap.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Omnichannel Tools (Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Adobe, HubSpot): ... They generally do not handle partners well.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Channel marketing · direct prompt · hard negative
“HubSpot and Salesforce Marketing Cloud (Avoid if you only need email marketing)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Most businesses shouldn't use HubSpot... For everyone else, it's a trap.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Marketing automation · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Marketing Hub, over the 987 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Marketing Hub was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as HubSpot Marketing Hub, over the 987 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HubSpot Marketing Hub was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HubSpot Marketing Hub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 934 of the 987 answers that named HubSpot Marketing Hub and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com275
blog.hubspot.comYour site274
g2.com244
ventureharbour.com198
learn.g2.com186
improvado.io169
thecmo.com163
guideflow.com156
hubspot.comYour site125
brevo.com108
1,499 of the 1,898 domain citations in answers naming HubSpot Marketing Hub came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where HubSpot Marketing Hub stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where HubSpot Marketing Hub stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“hubspot marketing hub”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 55 a month
- Its own site
- It sits on HubSpot's site (hubspot.com), so there are no site figures for it alone
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
63%
rank 1 of 59 in marketing automation
First choices
253
across its categories
- Named in
- 987 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 934 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as HubSpot Marketing Hub
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HubSpot Marketing Hub; a claim can dispute any of them.
HubSpot 133HubSpot ABM 11HubSpot Marketing Hub Professional 11HubSpot Analytics 4HubSpot Starter 4HubSpot Marketing Hub (Professional tier) 3HubSpot (Marketing Hub) 2HubSpot Content Hub / Marketing Hub 2HubSpot Enterprise 2HubSpot (Free or Starter) 1HubSpot (Marketing Hub Enterprise) 1HubSpot (Marketing Hub Pro) 1HubSpot (Marketing Hub Professional/Enterprise) 1HubSpot (SMS tools) 1HubSpot (Sales Hub / Service Hub) 1HubSpot ABM tools 1HubSpot Analytics (with Breeze Intelligence) 1HubSpot Attribution 1HubSpot CRM + Marketing Hub 1HubSpot Marketing Hub & Conversations (with Breeze AI) 1HubSpot Marketing Hub (Analytics & Attribution) 1HubSpot Marketing Hub (Conversations) 1HubSpot Marketing Hub (Enterprise) 1HubSpot Marketing Hub (Enterprise/Professional) 1
Follow HubSpot Marketing Hub
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Marketing Hub.ShowHide
The company
HubSpot is the company behind HubSpot Marketing Hub.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- hubspot.com
- Headquarters
- Cambridge, United States
- Founded
- 2006
- Employees
- about 8,246 (2024)
- Ownership
- Public, HUBS on New York Stock Exchange
- Also from HubSpot
- HubSpot, HubSpot ABM, HubSpot AEO Grader, HubSpot AI, HubSpot Academy, HubSpot Ad Management, HubSpot Ads, HubSpot Ads Management and 77 more
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Marketing automation software
- Price stated
- Free and premium plans academy.hubspot.com/scaling-marketing-hub
- Free plan or trial
- Free and premium plans academy.hubspot.com/scaling-marketing-hub
- Not stated on the pages read
- Who it is for, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What HubSpot Marketing Hub's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: academy.hubspot.com/scaling-marketing-hub, academy.hubspot.com/hubspot-marketing-software, academy.hubspot.com/marketing-hub-integrations, academy.hubspot.com/introduction-to-marketing-hub, academy.hubspot.com/ja-hubspot-marketing-software. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HubSpot Marketing Hub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HubSpot Marketing Hub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HubSpot Marketing Hub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where HubSpot Marketing Hub is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name HubSpot Marketing Hub, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where HubSpot Marketing Hub is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where HubSpot Marketing Hub is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideMarketing automation and campaign management
AI models recommend HubSpot Marketing Hub first in Marketing automation and campaign management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Ecommerce marketing
AI models recommend HubSpot Marketing Hub first in Ecommerce marketing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Email marketing platforms
AI models recommend HubSpot Marketing Hub first in Email marketing platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Content marketing platforms
HubSpot Marketing Hub is among the products AI models recommend first in Content marketing platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Account-based marketing platforms
HubSpot Marketing Hub is among the products AI models recommend first in Account-based marketing platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.