| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 21% | 2 of 59 | 8% | 24 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 26% → 23%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 12% | 3 of 66 | 8% | 37 | accepted challenger | ▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SMS and WhatsApp marketing platforms | Marketing | 10% | 3 of 111 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 7% | 6 of 124 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 8% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 4% | 7 of 115 | 0% | 18 | accepted challenger | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer data platforms | GTM data and infrastructure | 2% | 8 of 61 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Segment at 49% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 2% | 12 of 80 | 25% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 45% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI marketing agents | Marketing | 0% | 34 of 157 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Breeze at 24% | |
| Email deliverability and testing tools | Marketing | 0% | 42 of 110 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34% | |
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 51 of 135 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Email verification | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 59 of 65 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ZeroBounce at 42% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 0% | 45 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Value selling tools | Sales | 0% | 72 of 116 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Minoa at 21% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMS & WhatsApp | 0% | 11% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 11% now. | New this edition | Rank 3 of 111, unchanged |
| Email marketing | 16% | 10% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 16% → 10%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 of 66, unchanged |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 5% | ▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 11 → 7 of 115 |
| Marketing automation | 26% | 23% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 26% → 23%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 2 of 59, unchanged |
| CDP | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 8 of 61 |
| Mobile & push | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 34 → 12 of 80 |
| Channel marketing | 8% | 8% | ▼−1Since September 2026: 8% → 8%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 4 → 6 of 124 |
| AI marketing agents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 34 of 157, unchanged |
| Email deliverability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 110, unchanged |
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 40 → 51 of 135 |
| Email verification | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 59 of 65, unchanged |
| Landing pages | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 45 of 69 |
| Value selling | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 72 of 116, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 12 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 3 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 16 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 9 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 11 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The Best Overall Value: Brevo (formerly Sendinblue) Brevo is widely considered the most cost-effective all-in-one automation tool for small businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Marketing automation · budget prompt · first choice
“the best all-around marketing automation platform is usually Brevo because it offers a free plan and low starting prices” Perplexity Sonar · Marketing automation · budget prompt · first choice
“Sender and Brevo stand out as the most cost-effective through-channel marketing platforms with robust free plans” Mistral Small · Channel marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“Brevo is the most cited "best budget" platform because of the unlimited contacts free tier and email-volume pricing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Email marketing · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Brevo reviews include complaints about negative-framed opt-outs and automatic upgrades that users felt were deceptive.” GPT-5.4 mini · Email verification · negative prompt · soft negative
“The main downside is their sending limits... throttling speed or suspending accounts that spike in volume.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Marketing automation · negative prompt · soft negative
“Multiple Reddit users mention Brevo throttling speed or suspending accounts that spike in volume.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“It lacks the deep behavioral segmentation and API depth of Customer.io or Braze” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile & push · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 386 of the 403 answers that named Brevo and are not a share of its labels.
758 of the 908 domain citations in answers naming Brevo came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 460 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 127 | undated | |||
| Case study | 126 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 45 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 28 | undated | |||
| News or press | 21 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 0 | 2025-02-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2022-11-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2024-03-06 |
As the event pages on brevo.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page brevo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
What Brevo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: brevo.com, brevo.com/pricing, brevo.com/success_stories_topic/security, brevo.com/features/ai, brevo.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Brevo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Brevo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Brevo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Brevo is among the products AI models recommend first in Marketing automation and campaign management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Brevo is among the products AI models recommend first in Email marketing platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Brevo is among the products AI models recommend first in SMS and WhatsApp marketing platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.