Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 49 → 23 of 42
6 categories · RankedGetResponse
68Judge labels
0First choices
14Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
6Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Email marketing for mid-market buyers
Rank 16 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 21% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of GetResponse →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business17 of 49
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market16 of 66
0%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise40 of 51
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In email marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named GetResponse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 16 of 66 | 21% | 14 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 0% | 31 of 69 | 29% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 0% | 18 of 59 | 20% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 63% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 82 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 68 of 115 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
| Webinar and virtual event platforms | Marketing | 0% | 44 of 67 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Livestorm at 25% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, GetResponse held within the floor in all six categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Email marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 → 15 of 65
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 66 → 36 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 26 → 16 of 66 |
| Landing pages | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 31 of 69 |
| Marketing automation | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 18 of 59 |
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 64 → 82 of 124 |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 51 → 68 of 115 |
| Webinars | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 36 → 44 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated GetResponse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated GetResponse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained17 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative17 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose MailerLite, Mailchimp, or GetResponse if you want landing pages tightly connected to email marketing.” Perplexity Sonar · Landing pages · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for scalable B2B email marketing and offers a good balance of features and pricing for mid-sized businesses.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email marketing · direct prompt · alternative
“GetResponse (Plus $15/mo) | Includes landing pages, webinars, and e‑commerce tools in one cheap plan.” MiniMax M2.5 · Email marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“Opt for proven high-deliverability options like ActiveCampaign, MailerLite, or GetResponse.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Email marketing · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Free Email Provider Builders (e.g., Mailchimp, GetResponse Free Tiers) ... usually severely limited” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative
“Beehiiv, GetResponse, and MailerLite are the ones to approach with caution.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Email marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
“GetResponse's drag-and-drop landing page builder is difficult to customize” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Landing pages · negative prompt · soft negative
“though its paid entry point is higher than the cheapest options” Perplexity Sonar · Email marketing · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GetResponse, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GetResponse was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GetResponse, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GetResponse was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named GetResponse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 68 answers that named GetResponse and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
getresponse.comYour site35
emailtooltester.com25
blog.hubspot.com23
ventureharbour.com23
brevo.com21
emailvendorselection.com17
learn.g2.com14
g2.com13
improvado.io13
sender.net13
162 of the 197 domain citations in answers naming GetResponse came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
getresponse.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, GetResponse takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Marketing Hub takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
getresponse.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, GetResponse takes 0% of first choices and HubSpot Marketing Hub takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “email marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best email marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“getresponse”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 82 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 144,567 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 17,520 · 307 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 39,900
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 16 of 66 in email marketing
Segment leader
35%
HubSpot Marketing Hub
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 68 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 63 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on getresponse.com
1,584
subdomains included
Content
1,258
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
49 · 181
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 800 | 6 | 2026-09-10 | SEO, Ecommerce marketing | |
| Report or ebook | 129 | 0 | 2026-03-19 | SEO, CRM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 91 | 0 | 2026-06-19 | ||
| Podcast or video | 75 | 0 | 2023-03-29 | SEO | |
| Case study | 64 | 0 | 2023-01-11 | ||
| Template or tool | 46 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 35 | 0 | 2024-07-16 | SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 0 | 2024-11-19 | ||
| News or press | 7 | 0 | 2021-12-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2024-10-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-10B2c marketing automation software blog
- 2026-09-09Best marketing automation tools for saas companies blog
- 2026-09-04Best b2b marketing automation tools blog
- 2026-08-20Small business marketing automation software blog
- 2026-08-13Best ai lead nurturing tools blog
- 2026-08-11Best ecommerce marketing tools blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page getresponse.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (15); 6 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow GetResponse
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
GetResponse.ShowHide
The company
GetResponse.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- getresponse.com
- Headquarters
- Gdańsk, Poland
- Founded
- 1998
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Automation, Landing Pages and Email Marketing Platform
- For
- 350K+ entrepreneurs, ecommerce stores, and Global Brands
- Price stated
- See our pricing getresponse.com
- Starting price
- $19 per month for unlimited messages to 1,000 subscribers getresponse.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free 14-day trial getresponse.com
- Integrations claimed
- 170 getresponse.com
- Customers named
- Med&BeautyDAAGWürth GroupEveline CosmeticsAlison Tarrant WestnetMichael Simpson Jr The Residual EntrepreneurWürth MODYFSelsey
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What GetResponse's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: getresponse.com, getresponse.com/pricing, getresponse.com/features/support, getresponse.com/customers, getresponse.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GetResponse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GetResponse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GetResponse by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where GetResponse is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name GetResponse, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.