Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 7 → 10 of 42
5 categories · RankedMoosend
38Judge labels
1First choices
5Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
5Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Email marketing for mid-market buyers
Rank 7 of 66 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Moosend →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business10 of 49
0%9 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 66
2%11 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise48 of 51
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In email marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Moosend for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 2% | 7 of 66 | 9% | 11 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 37 of 115 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 92 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Email deliverability and testing tools | Marketing | 0% | 90 of 110 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by GlockApps at 34% | |
| Landing pages and interactive content | Marketing | 0% | 36 of 69 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Unbounce at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Moosend held within the floor in all five categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Email marketing · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 → 7 of 65
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 44 of 47
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Email marketing | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 7 of 66 |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 60 → 37 of 115 |
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 92 of 124, unchanged |
| Email deliverability | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 90 of 110, unchanged |
| Landing pages | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 58 → 36 of 69 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Moosend across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Moosend across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained18 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The most cost-effective email marketing platforms are Moosend, MailerLite, and Brevo.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Email marketing · budget prompt · first choice
“No free plan (30-day trial) | ~$7–$9/mo (unlimited emails) | Automation-heavy needs without daily caps” Grok 4.1 Fast · Email marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“one of the cheapest email marketing platforms, making it ideal for smaller stores” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Ecommerce marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“Extremely low-cost paid tiers... Moosend punches well above its weight class.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email marketing · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Excluded from some "best of" lists due to overlapping features with other tools and potential limitations in scalability” Mistral Small · Email marketing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Moosend, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Moosend was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Moosend, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Moosend was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Moosend. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named Moosend and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
emailvendorselection.com17
sequenzy.com16
brevo.com14
getresponse.com14
activecampaign.com12
emailtooltester.com12
sender.net12
mailtrap.io11
fitsmallbusiness.com10
ventureharbour.com9
127 of the 127 domain citations in answers naming Moosend came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
moosend.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Moosend takes 2% of first choices and HubSpot Marketing Hub takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
moosend.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Moosend takes 2% of first choices and HubSpot Marketing Hub takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “email marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best email marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“moosend”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 19 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 71,515 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 14,494 · 47 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 11,279
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 7 of 66 in email marketing
Segment leader
35%
HubSpot Marketing Hub
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 38 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 38 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on moosend.com
1,123
subdomains included
Content
792
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 9
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 612 | 9 | 2026-09-23 | CRM, Landing pages | |
| Comparison | 73 | 1 | 2026-08-19 | ||
| Template or tool | 62 | 0 | 2025-11-03 | Ecommerce | |
| Report or ebook | 10 | 0 | 2026-01-14 | ||
| Case study | 9 | 0 | 2026-04-10 | ||
| News or press | 8 | 0 | 2025-12-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2024-11-27 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 0 | 2025-04-14 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2024-12-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2025-01-31 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Growth marketing tools blog
- 2026-09-17Brand marketing tools blog
- 2026-09-14Email marketing kpis blog
- 2026-09-09Loyalty program email examples blog
- 2026-09-08Marketing channels blog
- 2026-09-02Small business thank you message to customers blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page moosend.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Moosend
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Moosend is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Moosend is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- #1 Email Marketing and Automation Software
- For
- small and big businesses worldwide
- Price stated
- Monthly Pay/month Biannual Save 15% Annual Save 20% $7 $9 Per month moosend.com
- Starting price
- 7 moosend.com
- Free plan or trial
- START FREE moosend.com
- Integrations claimed
- 80 moosend.com/pricing
- Certifications
- Certified SendersG2Email Vendor SelectionCapterraM3AAWGISO 27001Amazon Web ServicesSSL
- Hosting
- EU
- Customers named
- WWFMullenLowe GroupCareerbuilderVogueDOMINO’S
What Moosend's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: moosend.com, moosend.com/pricing, moosend.com/trust, moosend.com/features, moosend.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Moosend's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Moosend, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Moosend by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Moosend is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Moosend, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.