GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Moosend · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Moosend

Named in 3 judge labels across 1 category by 2 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 0 first choices, 0 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Moosend was named 3 times in Email marketing, where HubSpot Marketing Hub led with 67%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Moosend. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryVerticalFirst choicesRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Email marketing platforms conflict disclosedMarketing0%13 of 360%3under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 67%

By model

How each model treated Moosend across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Opus 500000
Claude Opus 4.800000
GPT-6 Astra00000
GPT-5.6 Sol00000
Gemini 3.1 Pro01001
Perplexity Sonar Pro02002

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Moosend doesn’t offer a free plan (only a 30-day trial), but it earns a spot on this list because its entry-level paid pricing is aggressively low” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Email marketing · budget prompt · alternative
“worth testing newer or more transparent alternatives like MailerLite, Brevo, Moosend, EmailOctopus, or Sender” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Email marketing · negative prompt · alternative
“Moosend — good for affordable automation and SMBs” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Email marketing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Names read as Moosend

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Moosend; a claim can dispute any of them.
Every label used the canonical name.
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Moosend, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.

Sponsor instead