Sender

Named in 6 judge labels across 1 category by 4 of 6 models in the September 2026 Edition. 2 first choices, 0 negative labels. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-08.5.

Best standing

11% in Email marketing

Rank 3 of 36 products named in email marketing platforms. 0 of 6 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sender. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Vertical	First choices	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Email marketing platforms conflict disclosed	Marketing	11%	3 of 36	0%	6	under 10 labels

By model

How each model treated Sender across every prompt where it was named. Six models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Opus 5	0	0	1	1
Claude Opus 4.8	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Astra	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.6 Sol	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.1 Pro	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar Pro	0	2	1	3

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Sender is currently one of the most generous platforms on the market, making it the top choice for cash-strapped startups and small businesses.” Gemini 3.1 Pro · Email marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“For a small company on a tight budget, I’d start with Sender” GPT-6 Astra · Email marketing · budget prompt · first choice

“worth testing newer or more transparent alternatives like MailerLite, Brevo, Moosend, EmailOctopus, or Sender” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Email marketing · negative prompt · alternative

“Sender — best if you want the strongest free tier” Perplexity Sonar Pro · Email marketing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Names read as Sender

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sender; a claim can dispute any of them.

Every label used the canonical name.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page gets a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sender, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a logo and one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or quadrants, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. Sponsorship is separate: a sponsor funds categories or buyer dimensions and is named on what it funded, and the rules are the same for every sponsor.