Every category where a model named Textedly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	0%	56 of 75	38%	8	under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Textedly yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Textedly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Textedly is widely positioned as a budget-friendly option” GPT-5.4 mini · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative

“Highlighted as an easy-to-use SMS tool for growing teams.” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · alternative

“Textedly for SMS” Kimi K2 · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Frequent Trustpilot complaints ... label it a "scam" due to non-functional websites, denied refunds” Grok 4.1 Fast · Mobile & push · negative prompt · hard negative

“2. Textedly ⚠️ Mixed Reviews - Trustpilot Score: Only 3.0/5 stars” Kimi K2 · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative

“Textedly & EZ Texting — Moderate caution” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Textedly, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Textedly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneSignal26 of 3415Not in the top three

SimpleTexting17 of 341Not in the top three

SlickText15 of 345Not in the top three

Braze14 of 342Not in the top three

Attentive14 of 340Not in the top three

CleverTap14 of 340Not in the top three

Omnisend13 of 341Not in the top three

Klaviyo11 of 340Not in the top three

EZ Texting10 of 340Not in the top three

Pushwoosh9 of 341Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Textedly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 34 answers that named Textedly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com7

businessofapps.com4

dash.app4

guideflow.com4

getapp.com3

onesignal.com3

courier.com2

didoo.ai2

engagelab.com2

g2.com2

Thirty-three of the thirty-three domain citations in answers naming Textedly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-mobile-marketing-software6

dash.app/blog/top-marketing-apps-small-business4

guideflow.com/blog/best-mobile-marketing-software4

businessofapps.com/marketplace/app-marketing2

businessofapps.com/marketplace/push-notifications2

courier.com/blog/top-push-notification-platforms2

didoo.ai/blog/15-best-mkt-apps-for-global-smes-affordable-growth-engines2

engagelab.com/blog/best-push-notification-service2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Textedly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Textedly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at textedly.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.