| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 0% | 17 of 80 | 24% | 25 | accepted challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| SMS and WhatsApp marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 20 of 111 | 11% | 19 | accepted challenger | |
| Ecommerce marketing | Marketing | 0% | 85 of 115 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 38% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 0% | 43 of 117 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Conversational marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 41 of 87 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13% | |
| Email marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 40 of 66 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 35% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Marketing automation and campaign management | Marketing | 0% | 35 of 59 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 63% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile & push | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 of 80, unchanged |
| SMS & WhatsApp | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 20 of 111, unchanged |
| Ecommerce marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 85 of 115 |
| Mobile apps | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 105 → 43 of 117 |
| Conversational mktg | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 87, unchanged |
| Email marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 40 of 66, unchanged |
| Marketing automation | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 35 of 59, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Established platforms like Twilio, Klaviyo, Attentive, SimpleTexting with clear pricing and compliance features” Kimi K2 · SMS & WhatsApp · negative prompt · first choice
“The gold standard for ecommerce SMS; managed, high-touch service with outstanding revenue attribution” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · first choice
“choose Klaviyo (for unified Email/SMS) or Attentive (for high-volume SMS/RCS growth)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SMS & WhatsApp · comparative prompt · first choice
“Described as the enterprise SMS platform, with managed compliance backed by an in-house legal team and patented two-tap signup.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms like Attentive do not publish transparent pricing. They often require quarterly minimum spend commitments” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Why we recommend avoiding Enterprise B2C options (like Braze or Attentive) for Mid-Market B2B” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mobile & push · direct prompt · hard negative
“Be Cautious of Enterprise SMS Platforms if You are an SMB/Startup... The Risk: Contractual lock-in and high spending minimums.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
“Attentive, if you need predictable, self-serve pricing. ... directs buyers to get a demo ... get a written, itemized quote” GPT-6 Luna · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 148 of the 160 answers that named Attentive and are not a share of its labels.
392 of the 457 domain citations in answers naming Attentive came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 455 | undated | Identity, Email marketing | ||
| Case study | 108 | undated | CRM | ||
| Podcast or video | 85 | undated | |||
| News or press | 53 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 17 | 1 | 2026-08-24 | CDP | |
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2024-09-23 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 5 | undated |
Every page attentive.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Attentive's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: attentive.com, attentive.com/pricing, attentive.com/compliance, attentive.com/platform-tour, attentive.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Attentive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Attentive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Attentive by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: