Every category where a model named Postscript for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	0%	22 of 75	14%	14	accepted challenger
Ecommerce marketing	Marketing	0%	22 of 154	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Postscript yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Postscript across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	3	0	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative19 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative14 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative39 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Postscript is a specialist tool that does only SMS incredibly well for online stores.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · alternative

“Shopify-only brands with real-time Shopify data integration ($49/mo minimum)” Mistral Small · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · alternative

“Klaviyo, Postscript, Omnisend | Built-in compliance, Shopify integration” Kimi K2 · Mobile & push · negative prompt · alternative

“SMS-first strategy | Postscript (Shopify) or Attentive (enterprise)” Kimi K2 · Ecommerce marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Klaviyo, Postscript, Attentive are e-commerce/D2C-focused — skip.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · direct prompt · hard negative

“What I'd skip ... Heavily e-commerce/DTC-centric (Shopify)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Postscript, over the 39 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Postscript was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Attentive35 of 393Not in the top three

Klaviyo33 of 395Not in the top three

Braze26 of 397Not in the top three

Omnisend22 of 395Not in the top three

OneSignal21 of 395Not in the top three

Airship18 of 392Not in the top three

SimpleTexting18 of 390Not in the top three

Twilio Programmable Messaging18 of 390Not in the top three

CleverTap15 of 390Not in the top three

Iterable12 of 390Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Postscript. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 39 answers that named Postscript and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

attentive.com2

klaviyo.com2

mobiloud.com2

omnisend.com2

sashido.io2

textus.com2

altosagency.com1

bloomreach.com1

brevo.com1

business.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming Postscript came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

klaviyo.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms2

mobiloud.com/blog/push-notifications-vs-sms2

omnisend.com/blog/push-notifications-vs-sms2

sashido.io/en/blog/best-push-notification-service-platforms-20262

altosagency.com/blog/article/sms-vs-push-notifications1

attentive.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms1

attentive.com/compliance1

bloomreach.com/en/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Postscript's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Postscript, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at postscript.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.