Every category where a model named SlickText for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	0%	19 of 75	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SlickText yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SlickText across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative10 labels5not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SimpleTexting, SlickText | Transparent pricing, good support” Kimi K2 · Mobile & push · negative prompt · alternative

“Small business simple SMS/MMS | SimpleTexting or SlickText” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · alternative

“#1 rated (4.8/5), visual workflows, keywords” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · alternative

“SlickText (Best for SMS-only focus)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SlickText, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SlickText was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneSignal25 of 3210Not in the top three

Omnisend19 of 324Not in the top three

SimpleTexting19 of 321Not in the top three

Braze16 of 324Not in the top three

Twilio Programmable Messaging16 of 321Not in the top three

Attentive16 of 320Not in the top three

Klaviyo15 of 321Not in the top three

Textedly15 of 320Not in the top three

TextMagic14 of 320Not in the top three

Airship12 of 321Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SlickText. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 32 answers that named SlickText and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

attentive.com3

bloomreach.com3

getapp.com3

brevo.com2

businessofapps.com2

getvero.com2

infobip.com2

klaviyo.com2

mailchimp.com2

mobile-text-alerts.com2

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming SlickText came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

attentive.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms3

bloomreach.com/en/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms3

businessofapps.com/marketplace/push-notifications2

getapp.com/marketing-software/sms-marketing/f/push-notifications2

infobip.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-software-platforms2

klaviyo.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms2

mailchimp.com/resources/push-notifications-vs-sms2

mobiloud.com/blog/push-notifications-vs-sms2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SlickText's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SlickText, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at slicktext.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.