GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › TextMagic · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

TextMagic

26Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Mobile & push for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 75 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 6 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In mobile & push · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TextMagic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Mobile marketing and pushMarketing2%9 of 750%6under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TextMagic yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TextMagic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained8 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative8 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“TextMagic for SMS (pay-as-you-go at $0.049 per message) for maximum budget efficiency” Mistral Small · Mobile & push · budget prompt · first choice
“For irregular SMS volume: Choose TextMagic with their pay-as-you-go model.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative
“layer in SMS via a pay-as-you-go tool like TextMagic if volumes are low” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TextMagic, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TextMagic was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
OneSignal20 of 2612Not in the top three
SimpleTexting16 of 261Not in the top three
Omnisend14 of 263Not in the top three
SlickText14 of 263Not in the top three
Twilio Programmable Messaging14 of 260Not in the top three
Klaviyo11 of 261Not in the top three
Attentive10 of 261Not in the top three
Braze10 of 261Not in the top three
EZ Texting10 of 260Not in the top three
Postscript8 of 260Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

The company

Textmagic is the company behind TextMagic.
Website
textmagic.com
Founded
2001

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TextMagic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TextMagic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at textmagic.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack