Every category where a model named TextMagic for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
SMS and WhatsApp marketing platforms	Marketing	4%	12 of 111	14%	14	accepted challenger
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	0%	24 of 80	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 45%	▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TextMagic yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TextMagic across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.20	0	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	2	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	1	0	2	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained20 labels3

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative15 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative56 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Occasional or Seasonal Texting: Textmagic ... With Textmagic, you buy credit blocks that never expire.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · SMS & WhatsApp · budget prompt · first choice

“If you have very limited budget and irregular needs: Go with Textmagic” Kimi K2 · SMS & WhatsApp · budget prompt · first choice

“lightweight platforms designed for small-to-mid businesses... Cons: Limited customization; may become too restrictive as you grow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“If your priority is SMS first rather than push, TextMagic or EZ Texting are cheaper entry points” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“SimpleTexting, TextMagic, EZ Texting (verify current 10DLC processing times and total cost before committing).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative

“Solid for basic use, but not for advanced marketers. The failed delivery issues are concerning” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SMS & WhatsApp · negative prompt · soft negative

“better if you have some technical setup capacity rather than needing an all-in-one easy tool” Perplexity Sonar · SMS & WhatsApp · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TextMagic, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TextMagic was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SimpleTexting37 of 569Not among the top eight

SlickText30 of 564Not among the top eight

EZ Texting26 of 563Not among the top eight

Textedly21 of 564Not among the top eight

OneSignal19 of 5612Not among the top eight

Omnisend19 of 562Not among the top eight

Attentive18 of 560Not among the top eight

Twilio17 of 564Not among the top eight

Braze14 of 560Not among the top eight

Klaviyo SMS12 of 560Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TextMagic. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 56 answers that named TextMagic and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

emailvendorselection.com29

g2.com26

mobile-text-alerts.com25

salesmessage.com22

sender.net21

attentive.com19

zapier.com19

slicktext.com18

txtimpact.com17

guideflow.com16

212 of the 212 domain citations in answers naming TextMagic came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

emailvendorselection.com/text-marketing-platforms24

salesmessage.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-software22

sender.net/blog/sms-marketing-platforms21

zapier.com/blog/best-sms-app19

attentive.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms18

aboutmartech.com/blog/cheapest-sms-marketing-software-small-business15

slicktext.com/blog/2025/10/best-sms-marketing-platforms15

wisepops.com/blog/push-notification-software13

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

textmagic.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TextMagic takes 4% of first choices and Customer.io takes 17%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “sms marketing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best sms marketing platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 8,100 a month (“textmagic”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 29 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 99,415 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 14,387 · 373 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,899
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

119+ ads · 68 text, 39 video, 12 image · 29 shown in the last 30 days

First shown November 2024, as Textmagic Limited, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 107 in the year, 12 before. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 12 of 111 in SMS & WhatsApp

Segment leader

17%

Customer.io

First choices: 3 across its categories
Named in: 56 answers
Its own site cited: in 56 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on textmagic.com

698

subdomains included

Content

306

counted in the table below

Documentation

268

Product · Integration

10 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	193	4	2026-08-14	CRM
Case study	52	0	2026-06-30
Comparison	17	0	2025-11-10
Template or tool	16	0	2025-05-21
Podcast or video	12	1	2026-08-03
Glossary or explainer	11	1	2026-07-25
Report or ebook	5	0	2025-01-29

Most recent

2026-08-14Automate sms order notifications woocommerce blog
2026-08-04How to ask customers for feedback blog
2026-08-03Shopify sms integration podcast or video
2026-07-27Feedback request text message templates blog
2026-07-25What is sms and how is it different from text messages glossary or explainer
2026-07-16Acma sms sender id rules blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page textmagic.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as TextMagic

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TextMagic; a claim can dispute any of them.

Textmagic 6Textmagic / SimpleTexting 1

Follow TextMagic

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Textmagic is the company behind TextMagic.

ShowHide

On record

Wikidata

Website: textmagic.com
Founded: 2001

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Business text messaging for marketing and communications
textmagic.com
For: businesses
textmagic.com
Price stated: Flexible pay-as-you-go pricing textmagic.com
Starting price: 0.049 textmagic.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Free trial textmagic.com
Integrations claimed: 1000 textmagic.com
Certifications: A2P 10DLCToll-FreeTCPACTIASOC 2 Type IIGDPR compliantPECRCASL
Customers named: Wellspace HealthcareShuqualak ManufacturingAthenix HealthcareWynterJJMIXICAJakolof Bay OystersComal Inn
Not stated on the pages read: Hosting

What TextMagic's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: textmagic.com, textmagic.com/pricing, textmagic.com/features, textmagic.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TextMagic's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TextMagic, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TextMagic by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where TextMagic is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name TextMagic, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.