AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › SimpleTexting · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

SimpleTexting

118Judge labels
15First choices
12Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in SMS & WhatsApp for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 111 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 27 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of SimpleTexting →
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In sms & whatsapp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SimpleTexting for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
SMS and WhatsApp marketing platformsMarketing4%9 of 1110%27accepted challenger
Mobile marketing and pushMarketing0%21 of 8020%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SimpleTexting yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SimpleTexting across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502002
GPT-5.4 mini01012
Gemini 3.5 Flash04105
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.2001304
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash03014
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash02002
Kimi K213004
GLM 4.7 FlashX12104
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B01102

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels7
Paraphrase11 labels3
Comparative28 labels8not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels3
Scale-constrained12 labels2
Negative27 labels5not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative118 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 28 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Established platforms like Twilio, Klaviyo, Attentive, SimpleTexting with clear pricing and compliance features” Kimi K2 · SMS & WhatsApp · negative prompt · first choice
“Start with SimpleTexting or EZ Texting for a user-friendly experience” GLM 4.7 FlashX · SMS & WhatsApp · budget prompt · first choice
“SimpleTexting is the safest pick for most small businesses” Perplexity Sonar · SMS & WhatsApp · budget prompt · first choice
“lightweight platforms designed for small-to-mid businesses... Cons: Limited customization; may become too restrictive as you grow.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“SimpleTexting — generally easier to use, but some users report billing/import/support issues.” GPT-5.4 mini · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
“10DLC delays, rising costs, support friction.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SimpleTexting, over the 118 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SimpleTexting was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Attentive39 of 1182Not among the top eight
TextMagic37 of 1181Not among the top eight
OneSignal33 of 11818Not among the top eight
Klaviyo SMS29 of 1183Not among the top eight
Omnisend28 of 1183Not among the top eight
WATI26 of 1183Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SimpleTexting. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 116 of the 118 answers that named SimpleTexting and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

salesmessage.com59
emailvendorselection.com48
sender.net47
g2.com46
attentive.com45
mobile-text-alerts.com44
zapier.com40
slicktext.com37
guideflow.com35
sinch.com33

434 of the 434 domain citations in answers naming SimpleTexting came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

simpletexting.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SimpleTexting takes 4% of first choices and Customer.io takes 17%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “sms marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sms marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
18,100 a month (“simpletexting”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
66 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 110,549 a month
Searches its site ranks for
14,863 · 850 in the top three
Sites linking to it
6,481
Paid Google search
5 searches its ads show for, about 90 clicks and $1,355 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
108 ads · 83 text, 18 image, 7 video · 76 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2022, as Simpletexting LLC, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 15 in the year, 93 before. 11 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 111 in SMS & WhatsApp
Segment leader
17%
Customer.io
First choices
15 across its categories
Named in
118 answers
Its own site cited
in 116 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on simpletexting.com
1,080
subdomains included
Content
759
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
64 · 72
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog49622026-08-07CRM, Direct mail
Case study14622026-09-24
Report or ebook39undated
Podcast or video2802025-10-03
Comparison2412026-08-27
Glossary or explainer17undated
Webinar or virtual event4undated
Template or tool402019-12-16
Conference or event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page simpletexting.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as SimpleTexting

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SimpleTexting; a claim can dispute any of them.
SimpleTexting & EZ Texting 1SimpleTexting / EZ Texting 1Textmagic / SimpleTexting 1

Follow SimpleTexting

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

SimpleTexting is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
SMS marketing services & texting platform
For
small businesses
Price stated
Estimated monthly cost $39.00 (billed yearly at $398.40) simpletexting.com/pricing
Starting price
39 simpletexting.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Try It Free simpletexting.com
Integrations claimed
1000 simpletexting.com
Hosting
US & Canada only
Customers named
Go Amazing EnergyLions Realty GroupLone Star CollegeKing's Cross BookstoreHighsmith CPAsIdaho Nanny AgencyUnited Country Property Solutions LLCJust Roots
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications

What SimpleTexting's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: simpletexting.com, simpletexting.com/pricing, simpletexting.com/features, simpletexting.com/customers, simpletexting.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SimpleTexting's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SimpleTexting, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SimpleTexting by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where SimpleTexting is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name SimpleTexting, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at simpletexting.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.