Every category where a model named SendPulse for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	2%	10 of 75	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34%
Chatbots and conversational AI for support	Customer	0%	83 of 106	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 35%
Mobile apps	Marketing	0%	74 of 136	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Meta Advantage+ App Campaigns at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SendPulse yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SendPulse across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained11 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Omnisend's free plan or SendPulse's free tier are excellent starting points” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Mobile & push · budget prompt · first choice

“SendPulse offers a free plan to get started and low-cost upgrades.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mobile apps · budget prompt · alternative

“Budget-Friendly All-in-One ... lowest possible entry price” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Mobile & push · direct prompt · alternative

“Best "All-in-One" Multichannel Tool: SendPulse” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SendPulse, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SendPulse was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneSignal18 of 2413Not in the top three

Omnisend10 of 241Not in the top three

ActiveCampaign7 of 242Not in the top three

Brevo6 of 240Not in the top three

Braze5 of 240Not in the top three

Klaviyo5 of 240Not in the top three

PushEngage5 of 240Not in the top three

TextMagic5 of 240Not in the top three

Twilio Programmable Messaging4 of 240Not in the top three

Webpushr4 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SendPulse. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 24 answers that named SendPulse and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

business.com3

emailvendorselection.com2

getvero.com2

viasocket.com2

wisepops.com2

brevo.com1

courier.com1

engagelab.com1

getapp.com1

guideflow.com1

Sixteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming SendPulse came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

business.com/categories/best-text-message-marketing-services3

emailvendorselection.com/text-marketing-platforms2

viasocket.com/discovery/blog/gea2wg/Push%20Notification%20Software/7-affordable-push-notif2

wisepops.com/blog/push-notification-software2

brevo.com/blog/push-notification-services1

courier.com/blog/top-push-notification-platforms1

engagelab.com/blog/push-notifications-cost1

getapp.com/marketing-software/sms-marketing/f/push-notifications1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

SendPulse.

Website: sendpulse.com
Headquarters: New York City, United States
Founded: 2015

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SendPulse's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SendPulse, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sendpulse.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.