| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 2% | 7 of 80 | 25% | 28 | criticized challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile & push | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 7 of 80 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd recommend Twilio as the top choice for a combined push and SMS messaging tool.” Grok 4.20 · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“If you need maximum flexibility, have dev resources, and anticipate very high volumes → Twilio is the more powerful (but more work) choice.” MiniMax M2.5 · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best if you want maximum flexibility and have engineering resources; it is positioned as customizable and API-driven.” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“If you want best-in-class SMS infrastructure: → Twilio (with a marketing layer like Braze or custom build)” Kimi K2 · Mobile & push · scale prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Be Cautious of Developer-First CPaaS Engines if You Lack Engineering Support... Avoid If: You are a marketer or small business owner with no coding experience.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
“Twilio (DIY API) has mixed rep for SMS—solid infrastructure but complaints on deliverability/support; deprecated Notify service in 2025.” Grok 4.20 · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
“Not a scam, but pricing surprises — carrier surcharges, 10DLC fees, and number rental can add ~50%+ to your budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
“Twilio or another API-first SMS service, if you don’t have technical and compliance ownership.” GPT-6 Luna · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 88 answers that named Twilio Programmable Messaging and are not a share of its labels.
300 of the 300 domain citations in answers naming Twilio Programmable Messaging came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase
What Twilio Programmable Messaging's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: twilio.com/en-us/messaging/apis/programmable-messaging-api. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Twilio Programmable Messaging's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Twilio Programmable Messaging, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Twilio Programmable Messaging by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: