Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 63 → 56 of 130
Firebase Cloud Messaging
33Judge labels
4First choices
17Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Mobile apps for mid-market buyers
Rank 19 of 117 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business60 of 138
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market19 of 117
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In mobile apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Firebase Cloud Messaging for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile apps | Marketing | 2% | 19 of 117 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Customer.io at 17% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 0% | 80 of 80 | 56% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 45% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| In-app messaging and customer communications | Customer | 0% | 73 of 105 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Firebase Cloud Messaging held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Mobile apps · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 55 → 15 of 105
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile apps | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 55 → 19 of 117 |
| Mobile & push | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 80 of 80 |
| In-app messaging | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 81 → 73 of 105 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Firebase Cloud Messaging across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Firebase Cloud Messaging across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase4 labels2
Comparative10 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels2
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Firebase & OneSignal (Free): For analytics, tracking user behavior, and sending free push notifications.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Mobile apps · budget prompt · first choice
“| Firebase Cloud Messaging | Free | Push notifications |” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile apps · budget prompt · alternative
“FCM: Completely free unlimited push (Android/iOS/web)” Grok 4.20 · Mobile & push · budget prompt · alternative
“100% free for a generous usage tier.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · In-app messaging · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“cheapest at $0 for unlimited delivery but it requires engineering effort to add segmentation and orchestration” Muse Glimmer 30B · Mobile & push · budget prompt · soft negative
“lacks the marketing-specific automation (segments, templates) found in Braze or OneSignal” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Mobile & push · comparative prompt · soft negative
“essentially free for push notifications, but it is not a full marketing platform” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile & push · budget prompt · soft negative
“get "no first choice" flags in AI indexes for lacking marketing features” Grok 4.20 · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Firebase Cloud Messaging, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Firebase Cloud Messaging was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Firebase Cloud Messaging, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Firebase Cloud Messaging was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Firebase Cloud Messaging. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 33 answers that named Firebase Cloud Messaging and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
onesignal.com18
courier.com16
pushwoosh.com16
viasocket.com16
guideflow.com15
engagelab.com13
businessofapps.com12
wisepops.com11
attentive.com10
g2.com10
No domain is on file for Firebase Cloud Messaging, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Firebase Cloud Messaging stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Firebase Cloud Messaging stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,000 a month (“firebase cloud messaging”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 32 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 19 of 117 in mobile apps
Segment leader
17%
Customer.io
- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 33 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Firebase Cloud Messaging
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Firebase Cloud Messaging; a claim can dispute any of them.
Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) 7Firebase Cloud Messaging (FCM) & Analytics 1
Follow Firebase Cloud Messaging
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Firebase Cloud Messaging's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Firebase Cloud Messaging, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Firebase Cloud Messaging by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Firebase Cloud Messaging is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Firebase Cloud Messaging, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.